Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25810093›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2015

Parental age affects somatic mutation rates in the progeny of flowering plants.

Amit Kumar Singh, Tufail Bashir, Christian Sailer, Viswanathan Gurumoorthy, Anantha Maharasi Ramakrishnan, Shanmuhapreya Dhanapal, Ueli Grossniklaus, Ramamurthy Baskar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Levels of Heterochiasmy DuringG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amit Kumar SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai 600 036, India (A.K.S., T.B., V.G., A.M.R., S.D., R.B.); andInstitute of Plant Biology and Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland (C.S., U.G.).
Tufail BashirDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai 600 036, India (A.K.S., T.B., V.G., A.M.R., S.D., R.B.); andInstitute of Plant Biology and Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland (C.S., U.G.).
Christian SailerDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai 600 036, India (A.K.S., T.B., V.G., A.M.R., S.D., R.B.); andInstitute of Plant Biology and Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland (C.S., U.G.).
Viswanathan GurumoorthyDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai 600 036, India (A.K.S., T.B., V.G., A.M.R., S.D., R.B.); andInstitute of Plant Biology and Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland (C.S., U.G.).
Anantha Maharasi RamakrishnanDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai 600 036, India (A.K.S., T.B., V.G., A.M.R., S.D., R.B.); andInstitute of Plant Biology and Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland (C.S., U.G.).
Shanmuhapreya DhanapalDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai 600 036, India (A.K.S., T.B., V.G., A.M.R., S.D., R.B.); andInstitute of Plant Biology and Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland (C.S., U.G.).
Ueli GrossniklausDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai 600 036, India (A.K.S., T.B., V.G., A.M.R., S.D., R.B.); andInstitute of Plant Biology and Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland (C.S., U.G.).
Ramamurthy BaskarDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai 600 036, India (A.K.S., T.B., V.G., A.M.R., S.D., R.B.); andInstitute of Plant Biology and Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland (C.S., U.G.) rbaskar@iitm.ac.in.
Indian Institute of Technology Madras · INUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, it is well known that the parental reproductive age has a strong influence on mutations transmitted to their progeny. Meiotic nondisjunction is known to increase in older mothers, and base substitutions tend to go up with paternal reproductive age. Hence, it is clear that the germinal mutation rates are a function of both maternal and paternal ages in humans. In contrast, it is unknown whether the parental reproductive age has an effect on somatic mutation rates in the progeny, because these are rare and difficult to detect. To address this question, we took advantage of the plant model system Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), where mutation detector lines allow for an easy quantitation of somatic mutations, to test the effect of parental age on somatic mutation rates in the progeny. Although we found no significant effect of parental age on base substitutions, we found that frameshift mutations and transposition events increased in the progeny of older parents, an effect that is stronger through the maternal line. In contrast, intrachromosomal recombination events in the progeny decrease with the age of the parents in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner. Our results clearly show that parental reproductive age affects somatic mutation rates in the progeny and, thus, that some form of age-dependent information, which affects the frequency of double-strand breaks and possibly other processes involved in maintaining genome integrity, is transmitted through the gametes.

Indexed as

Mutation RateArabidopsisCell CountChromosomes, PlantDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedFlowersFrameshift MutationMutationPloidiesRecombination, GeneticReproductionSeedlings

Identifiers

PMID25810093
PMCPMC4424033
OpenAlexW2004265908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.