ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2015
Formation of a(1) ions directly from oxazolone b(2) ions: an energy-resolved and computational study.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure and fragmentation chemistry of the peptide radical cations of glycylphenylalanylglycine (GFG).PloS one · 2024Article
- Water Loss from Protonated XxxSer and XxxThr Dipeptides Gives Oxazoline-Not Oxazolone-Product Ions.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2020Article
- Sequence Ion Structures and Dissociation Chemistry of Deprotonated Sucrose Anions.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2018Article
- Cationized Carbohydrate Gas-Phase Fragmentation Chemistry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017Article
- Thermodynamics and Reaction Mechanisms of Decomposition of the Simplest Protonated Tripeptide, Triglycine: A Guided Ion Beam and Computational Study.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017Article
- Difference of Electron Capture and Transfer Dissociation Mass Spectrometry on Ni(2+)-, Cu(2+)-, and Zn(2+)-Polyhistidine Complexes in the Absence of Remote Protons.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2016Article
- Proton Mobility in b₂ Ion Formation and Fragmentation Reactions of Histidine-Containing Peptides.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well-known that oxazolone b2 ions fragment extensively by elimination of CO to form a2 ions, which often fragment further to form a1 ions. Less well-known is that some oxazolone b2 ions may fragment directly to form a1 ions. The present study uses energy-resolved collision-induced dissociation experiments to explore the occurrence of the direct b2→a1 fragmentation reaction. The experimental results show that the direct b2→a1 reaction is generally observed when Gly is the C-terminal residue of the oxazolone. When the C-terminal residue is more complex, it is able to provide increased stability of the a2 product in the b2→a2 fragmentation pathway. Our computational studies of the relative critical reaction energies for the b2→a2 reaction compared with those for the b2→a1 reaction provide support that the critical reaction energies are similar for the two pathways when the C-terminal residue of the oxazolone is Gly. By contrast, when the nitrogen of the oxazolone ring in the b2 ion does not bear a hydrogen, as in the Ala-Sar and Tyr-Sar (Sar = N-methylglycine) oxazolone b2 ions, a1 ions are not formed but rather neutral imine elimination from the N-terminus of the b2 ion becomes a dominant fragmentation reaction. The M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p) density functional theory calculations are in general agreement with the experimental data for both types of reaction. In contrast, the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) model systematically underestimates the barriers of these SN2-like b2→a1 reaction. The difference between the two methods of barrier calculation are highly significant (P < 0.001) for the b2→a1 reaction, but only marginally significant (P = 0.05) for the b2→a2 reaction. The computations provide further evidence of the limitations of the B3LYP functional when describing SN2-like reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25810075What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.