Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25809789›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2015

Rhythms and blues: modulation of oscillatory synchrony and the mechanism of action of antidepressant treatments.

Andrew F Leuchter, Aimee M Hunter, David E Krantz, Ian A Cook

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04019054 (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04019054 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in Conjunction With Exposure Therapy for the Treatment of Spider Phobia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2019 to 2020Enrolled22ConditionsArachnophobia, PhobiaArmsIntermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS), Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex (vmPFC), Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS), vertex
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Neuromodulation of Fear and Anxiety Circuits.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Imaging TMS: antidepressant mechanisms and treatment optimization.International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) · 2017
    Review
  20. Network-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression.Current behavioral neuroscience reports · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew F LeuchterLaboratory of Brain, Behavior, and Pharmacology, and the Depression Research and Clinic Program, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Aimee M Hunter
David E Krantz
Ian A Cook
Neurobehavioral Systems · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Personalized Response Indicators of SSRI Effectiveness in Major DepressionR01MH085925 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COOK, IAN A · 2009 to 2011
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) act at different hierarchical levels of biological complexity, ranging from the individual synapse to the brain as a whole. Theories of antidepressant medication action traditionally have focused on the level of cell-to-cell interaction and synaptic neurotransmission. However, recent evidence suggests that modulation of synchronized electrical activity in neuronal networks is a common effect of antidepressant treatments, including not only medications, but also neuromodulatory treatments such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Synchronization of oscillatory network activity in particular frequency bands has been proposed to underlie neurodevelopmental and learning processes, and also may be important in the mechanism of action of antidepressant treatments. Here, we review current research on the relationship between neuroplasticity and oscillatory synchrony, which suggests that oscillatory synchrony may help mediate neuroplastic changes related to neurodevelopment, learning, and memory, as well as medication and neuromodulatory treatment for MDD. We hypothesize that medication and neuromodulation treatments may have related effects on the rate and pattern of neuronal firing, and that these effects underlie antidepressant efficacy. Elucidating the mechanisms through which oscillatory synchrony may be related to neuroplasticity could lead to enhanced treatment strategies for MDD.

Indexed as

Biological ClocksCell CommunicationNeuronal PlasticitySynaptic TransmissionAnimalsHumansLearningMajor Depressive DisorderMemoryNerve Netantidepressant medicationantidepressant treatmentbiomarkersbiosignaturesintermediate phenotypemajor depressive disordermechanism of actionneuromodulationoscillationsoscillatory synchronyquantitative electroencephalographythalamocortical dysrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID25809789
PMCPMC4412810
OpenAlexW2147547930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.