Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25809657›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2016

PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study.

Ivana Drobnjak, Hui Zhang, Andrada Ianuş, Enrico Kaden, Daniel C Alexander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Engineering clinical translation of OGSE diffusion MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivana DrobnjakDepartment of Computer Science and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Hui ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Andrada IanuşDepartment of Computer Science and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Enrico KadenDepartment of Computer Science and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Daniel C AlexanderDepartment of Computer Science and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London (UCL), London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M009106/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify optimal pulsed gradient spin-echo (PGSE) and oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE) sequence settings for maximizing sensitivity to axon diameter in idealized and practical conditions.

methodsSimulations on a simple two-compartment white matter model (with nonpermeable cylinders) are used to investigate a wide space of clinically plausible PGSE and OGSE sequence parameters with trapezoidal diffusion gradient waveforms. Signal sensitivity is measured as a derivative of the signal with respect to axon diameter. Models of parallel and dispersed fibers are investigated separately to represent idealized and practical conditions.

resultsSimulations show that, for the simple case of gradients perfectly perpendicular to straight parallel fibers, PGSE always gives maximum sensitivity. However, in real-world scenarios where fibers have unknown and dispersed orientation, low-frequency OGSE provides higher sensitivity. Maximum sensitivity results show that on current clinical scanners (Gmax  = 60 mT/m, signal to noise ratio (SNR) = 20) axon diameters below 6 µm are indistinguishable from zero. Scanners with stronger gradient systems such as the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Connectom scanner (Gmax  = 300 mT/m) can extend this sensitivity limit down to 2-3 µm, probing a much greater proportion of the underlying axon diameter distribution.

conclusionLow-frequency OGSE provides additional sensitivity to PGSE in practical situations. OGSE is particularly advantageous for systems with high performance gradients.

Indexed as

AxonsComputer SimulationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityWhite Matteraxon diameterdiffusion gradientsdiffusion imagingoscillating gradient spin-echopulsed gradient spin-echo

Identifiers

PMID25809657
PMCPMC4975609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.