ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2015
Multi-modality imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion with emphasis on stress perfusion CT and MR imaging.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Functional Coronary Artery Assessment: a Systematic Literature Review.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2022Pooled it
- Data-driven atherosclerotic plaque profiles from QAngio-CT associated with functional impairments assessed with PET-CT.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2026Article
- Quantitative cardiac CT perfusion: physiologically-inspired model and identifying microvascular disease from discordant CTA CAD-RADS.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Current Status of Cardiac CT for Nuclear Medicine Professionals: Coronary Artery Disease Evaluation.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- [Evaluation of Myocardial Ischemia Using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients with Stable Angina].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi · 2020Review
- Temporal averaging for analysis of four-dimensional whole-heart computed tomography perfusion of the myocardium: proof-of-concept study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017Article
- Observational
- Cardiovascular imaging 2015 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-quality and non-invasive diagnostic tools for assessing myocardial ischemia are necessary for therapeutic decisions regarding coronary artery disease. Myocardial perfusion has been studied using myocardial contrast echo perfusion, single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and, more recently, computed tomography. The addition of coronary computed tomography angiography to myocardial perfusion imaging improves the specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy of detecting the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. This study reviews the benefits, limitations, and imaging findings of various imaging modalities for assessing myocardial perfusion, with particular emphasis on stress perfusion computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25809387What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.