Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25809308›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2015

[Indication and control of volume therapy. First things first].

U Janssens, S Kluge

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Functional hemodynamic monitoring].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. [Hemodynamic monitoring of critically ill patients : Bedside integration of data].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

U JanssensKlinik für Innere Medizin, St.-Antonius-Hospital, Dechant-Deckers-Straße 8, 52249, Eschweiler, Deutschland, uwe.janssens@sah-eschweiler.de.
S Kluge
St.-Antonius-Hospital Gronau · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluid therapy is a core concept in the management of perioperative and critically ill patients for maintenance of intravascular volume and organ perfusion. The clinical determination of the intravascular volume can be extremely difficult. Indication and control for intravascular volume therapy are among the most difficult aspects of intensive care. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature review was performed.

resultsThe goal of cardiovascular therapy is to enhance adequate blood flow and oxygen delivery to the tissues to meet the varying metabolic demands of the tissues without inducing untoward cardiorespiratory complications. A careful history and clinical examination are indispensable and allow evaluation of tissue and organ perfusion. Laboratory examinations, bedside ultrasonography as well as invasive hemodynamic monitoring complete the assessment and allow guidance of fluid therapy.

conclusionsCase history, clinical examinations, bedside ultrasonography, and invasive hemodynamic monitoring complete the assessment and allow clinicians to assess volume responsiveness.

Indexed as

Blood VolumeDehydrationEchocardiographyEthics, MedicalFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansInfusions, IntravenousMicrocirculationShockVena Cava, Inferior

Identifiers

PMID25809308
OpenAlexW290432344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.