Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25808992›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational rehabilitation2015

What Challenges Manual Workers' Ability to Cope with Back Pain at Work, and What Influences Their Decision to Call in Sick?

Pernille Frederiksen, Mette Marie V Karsten, Aage Indahl, Tom Bendix

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pernille FrederiksenCopenhagen Center for Back Research (COPE BACK), Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup University Hospital, Ndr. Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark. frederiksarbejde@outlook.dk.
Mette Marie V KarstenCopenhagen Center for Back Research (COPE BACK), Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup University Hospital, Ndr. Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
Aage IndahlDepartment of Research and Development, Clinic Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Stavern, Norway.
Tom BendixCopenhagen Center for Back Research (COPE BACK), Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup University Hospital, Ndr. Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKGlostrup Hospital · DKUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough back pain (BP) is a very common cause for sickness absence, most people stay at work during BP episodes. Existing knowledge on the factors influencing the decision to stay at work despite pain is limited. The aim of this study was to explore challenges for coping with BP at work and decisive factors for work attendance among workers with high physical work demands.

methodsThree focus groups (n = 20) were conducted using an explorative inductive method. Participants were public-employed manual workers with high physical work demands. All had personal BP experience. Thematic analysis was used for interpretation. Results were matched with the Flags system framework to guide future recommendations.

resultsWorkers with BP were challenged by poor physical work conditions and a lack of supervisor support/trust (i.e. lack of adjustment latitude). Organization of workers into teams created close co-worker relationships, which positively affected BP coping. Workers responded to BP by applying helpful individual adjustments to reduce or prevent pain. Traditional ergonomics was considered inconvenient, but nonetheless ideal. When pain was not decisive, the decision to call in sick was mainly governed by workplace factors (i.e. sick absence policies, job strain, and close co-workers relationships) and to a less degree by personal factors.

conclusionFactors influencing BP coping at work and the decision to report sick was mainly governed by factors concerning general working conditions. Creating a flexible and inclusive working environment guided by the senior management and overall work environment regulations seems favourable.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthPresenteeismSick LeaveAdultBack PainDecision MakingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational PolicyPain MeasurementPhysical ExertionQualitative ResearchSocial SupportBack painFocus groupsSick leaveSickness absenceSocial supportWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID25808992
OpenAlexW2070945314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.