Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25808628›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2016

Specific Preferences in Lineage Choice and Phenotypic Plasticity of Glioma Stem Cells Under BMP4 and Noggin Influence.

Guillermo Agustín Videla Richardson, Carolina Paola Garcia, Alejandro Roisman, Irma Slavutsky, Damián Darío Fernandez Espinosa, Leonardo Romorini, Santiago Gabriel Miriuka, Naomi Arakaki, Horacio Martinetto, María Elida Scassa and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of Neurodevelopmental Pathways in Brain Tumors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The Cell Cycle Inhibitors p21Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guillermo Agustín Videla RichardsonLaboratorio de Investigación aplicada a Neurociencias (LIAN), Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Escobar, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carolina Paola GarciaLaboratorio de Investigación aplicada a Neurociencias (LIAN), Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Escobar, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Alejandro RoismanLaboratorio de Neuropatología, Departamento de Neuropatología y Biología Molecular, Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Irma SlavutskyLaboratorio de Neuropatología, Departamento de Neuropatología y Biología Molecular, Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Damián Darío Fernandez EspinosaLaboratorio de Investigación aplicada a Neurociencias (LIAN), Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Escobar, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Leonardo RomoriniLaboratorio de Investigación aplicada a Neurociencias (LIAN), Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Escobar, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Santiago Gabriel MiriukaLaboratorio de Investigación aplicada a Neurociencias (LIAN), Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Escobar, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Naomi ArakakiLaboratorio de Biología Molecular, Departamento de Neuropatología y Biología Molecular, Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Horacio MartinettoLaboratorio de Genética de Neoplasias Linfoides, Instituto de Medicina Experimental, CONICET, Academia Nacional de Medicina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María Elida ScassaLaboratorio de Investigación aplicada a Neurociencias (LIAN), Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Escobar, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gustavo Emilio SevleverLaboratorio de Biología Molecular, Departamento de Neuropatología y Biología Molecular, Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia · ARAcademia Nacional de Medicina · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although BMP4-induced differentiation of glioma stem cells (GSCs) is well recognized, details of the cellular responses triggered by this morphogen are still poorly defined. In this study, we established several GSC-enriched cell lines (GSC-ECLs) from high-grade gliomas. The expansion of these cells as adherent monolayers, and not as floating neurospheres, enabled a thorough study of the phenotypic changes that occurred during their differentiation. Herein, we evaluated GSC-ECLs' behavior toward differentiating conditions by depriving them of growth factors and/or by adding BMP4 at different concentrations. After analyzing cellular morphology, proliferation and lineage marker expression, we determined that GSC-ECLs have distinct preferences in lineage choice, where some of them showed an astrocyte fate commitment and others a neuronal one. We found that this election seems to be dictated by the expression pattern of BMP signaling components present in each GSC-ECL. Additionally, treatment of GSC-ECLs with the BMP antagonist, Noggin, also led to evident phenotypic changes. Interestingly, under certain conditions, some GSC-ECLs adopted an unexpected smooth muscle-like phenotype. As a whole, our findings illustrate the wide differentiation potential of GSCs, highlighting their molecular complexity and paving a way to facilitate personalized differentiating therapies.

Indexed as

AgedAntigens, CDBone Morphogenetic Protein 4Brain NeoplasmsCarrier ProteinsCell DifferentiationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGliomaHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Stem CellsNerve Tissue ProteinsNoggin ProteinAntigens, CDBMP4 protein, humanBone Morphogenetic Protein 4Carrier ProteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNoggin ProteinBMP4cancer stem cellsdifferentiationglioblastomamultipotencyNoggin

Identifiers

PMID25808628
PMCPMC8029422
OpenAlexW1994964789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.