ReviewPediatric blood & cancer2015
Use of patient registries and administrative datasets for the study of pediatric cancer.
Review in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Growth Trajectories in Stimulant Treated Children and Adolescents: A Qualitative Review of the Literature from Comprehensive Datasets and Registries.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Generalizable EHR-R-REDCap pipeline for a national multi-institutional rare tumor patient registry.JAMIA open · 2022Article
- Combining data to perform population-based observational studies: know your sources. The case of thyroid cancer in Belgium.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022Article
- A model for building a national, patient-driven database to track contraceptive use in women with rare diseases.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Hepatic vascular malignancies in children are associated with increased rates of surgical resection and improved overall survival compared with adults.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2021Article
- Albertans for Health Research Network: Form, Fit, and Function.Journal of patient experience · 2020Article
- Management of neuroblastoma in limited-resource settings.World journal of clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Article
- Where Sepsis and Antimicrobial Resistance Countermeasures Converge.Frontiers in public health · 2017Article
- Factors associated with survival in pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).Journal of pediatric surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of data from large administrative databases and patient registries is increasingly being used to study childhood cancer care, although the value of these data sources remains unclear to many clinicians. Interpretation of large databases requires a thorough understanding of how the dataset was designed, how data were collected, and how to assess data quality. This review will detail the role of administrative databases and registry databases for the study of childhood cancer, tools to maximize information from these datasets, and recommendations to improve the use of these databases for the study of pediatric oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.