ReviewPediatric surgery international2015
Urine biomarkers for necrotizing enterocolitis.
Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers for Necrotising Enterocolitis-Are We There Yet?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI models in clinical neonatology: a review of modeling approaches and a consensus proposal for standardized reporting of model performance.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- DNA methylation in necrotizing enterocolitis.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Plasma Metabolomics to Evaluate Progression of Necrotising Enterocolitis in Preterm Pigs.Metabolites · 2021Article
- Recent Potential Noninvasive Biomarkers in Necrotizing Enterocolitis.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2019Review
- Paediatrics: Are human milk oligosaccharides the magic bullet for necrotizing enterocolitis?Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in premature neonates. Despite decades of investigation, treating clinicians are still not able to determine which premature infants are at greatest risk of developing NEC and which of the affected infants will develop severe NEC requiring operation. A biomarker is a specific molecular indicator that can be used to identify or measure the progress of a disease. Many potential biomarkers have been studied for their potential relevance to NEC. Those showing promise include C-reactive protein, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, platelet-activating factor and many others. None to date have achieved sufficient predictive value to be clinically useful. Distinguishing between the specific changes in NEC and the non-specific inflammation of sepsis has proven challenging. Urine is a particularly attractive site for potential biomarkers. It can be collected readily and non-invasively, and it is a rich source of both proteins and peptides. Preliminary work has revealed some promising biomarkers of NEC in urine. Combined with clinical data, they have been shown to be highly predictive in small series of patients. Advances in high-throughput molecular analysis have opened the door to finding biomarkers that may meaningfully improve the outcome of infants at risk for NEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25807901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.