Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25807354›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2015

Latest consensus and update on protein-energy wasting in chronic kidney disease.

Yoshitsugu Obi, Hemn Qader, Csaba P Kovesdy, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 288 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshitsugu ObiaDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension bHarold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California cUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Hemn Qader
Csaba P Kovesdy
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Hypertension Institute · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
Transition of Care in CKD (TC-CKD)U01DK102163 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JACOBSEN, STEVEN J, KALANTAR-ZADEH, KAMYAR · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
MALNUTRITION, DIET AND RACIAL DISPARITIES IN CKDK24DK091419 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI KALANTAR-ZADEH, KAMYAR · 2011 to 2020
$1.8M
Examining Racial and Cardiovascular Paradoxes in Chronic Kidney DiseaseR01DK078106 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KALANTAR-ZADEH, KAMYAR · 2007 to 2011
$1.1M
Racial and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Anomalies in CKDR01DK096920 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI KALANTAR-ZADEH, KAMYAR, KOVESDY, CSABA PAL · 2013 to 2015
$909k
Comparative Effectiveness of Home Hemodialysis versus Kidney Transplantation in tR21AG047036 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI KALANTAR-ZADEH, KAMYAR, MOLNAR, MIKLOS ZSOLT · 2013 to 2014
$424k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NIA NIH HHS R21 AG047036NIA NIH HHS R21-AG047036NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK091419NIDDK NIH HHS K24-DK091419NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK078106NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK078106NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK096920NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK096920NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK102163NIDDK NIH HHS U01-DK102163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewProtein-energy wasting (PEW) is a state of metabolic and nutritional derangements in chronic disease states including chronic kidney disease (CKD). Cumulative evidence suggests that PEW, muscle wasting and cachexia are common and strongly associated with mortality in CKD, which is reviewed here. RECENT

findingsThe malnutrition-inflammation score (KALANTAR Score) is among the comprehensive and outcome-predicting nutritional scoring tools. The association of obesity with poor outcomes is attenuated across more advanced CKD stages and eventually reverses in the form of obesity paradox. Frailty is closely associated with PEW, muscle wasting and cachexia. Muscle loss shows stronger associations with unfavorable outcomes than fat loss. Adequate energy supplementation combined with low-protein diet for the management of CKD may prevent the development of PEW and can improve adherence to low-protein diet, but dietary protein requirement may increase with aging and is higher under dialysis therapy. Phosphorus burden may lead to poor outcomes. The target serum bicarbonate concentration is normal range and at least 23 mEq/l for nondialysis-dependent and dialysis-dependent CKD patients, respectively. A benefit of exercise is suggested but not yet conclusively proven. SUMMARY: Prevention and treatment of PEW should involve individualized and integrated approaches to modulate identified risk factors and contributing comorbidities.

Indexed as

Nutritional RequirementsAgingCachexiaConsensusDietDietary ProteinsHumansMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyProtein-Energy MalnutritionRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicWasting SyndromeDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25807354
PMCPMC4506466
OpenAlexW2009412498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.