ArticleeLife2015
New opportunities at the wild frontier.
Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of rearing environment on C. elegans: phenotypic, transcriptomic and intergenerational responses to 3D enriched habitats.Biology open · 2026Article
- From few to many: How non-model organisms' genomics broadened our understanding of molecular evolution.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- The impact of rearing environment onbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Temporal dynamics of courtship and spawning in medaka under laboratory conditions revealed by 24 h video monitoring.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Characterizing stage-dependent neuromotor patterns inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Fieldwork on animals living in extreme conditions as a source of biomedical innovation.Science in One Health · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Diversifying the concept of model organisms in the age of -omics.Communications biology · 2023Review
- Model worms: knowledge gains and risks associated with the use of model species in parasitological research.Parasitology · 2023Review
- Functional annotation of proteins for signaling network inference in non-model species.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The biology ofeLife · 2022Article
- Alkaloid production and response to natural adverse conditions inBiotechnologia · 2022Article
- The real Nemo movie: Description of embryonic development in Amphiprion ocellaris from first division to hatching.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021Article
- The enigmatic biology of rickettsiae: recent advances, open questions and outlook.Pathogens and disease · 2021Review
- Article
- Natural history of model organisms: The secret (group) life ofEcology and evolution · 2020Article
- Tasting the terroir of wine yeast innovation.FEMS yeast research · 2020Review
- Article
- The rise to dominance of genetic model organisms and the decline of curiosity-driven organismal research.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A better understanding of the natural history of model organisms will increase their value as model systems and also keep them at the forefront of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.