ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2015
Gigantism, acromegaly, and GPR101 mutations.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Relevance of Genetic Analysis in Patients With Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Pooled it
- GPR101 mediates the pro-resolving actions of RvD5n-3 DPA in arthritis and infections.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2020Article
- The causes and consequences of pituitary gigantism.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2018Review
- The genetic background of acromegaly.Pituitary · 2017Review
- Article
- Toward the next step in G protein-coupled receptor research: a knowledge-driven analysis for the next potential targets in drug discovery.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016Article
- Germline or somatic GPR101 duplication leads to X-linked acrogigantism: a clinico-pathological and genetic study.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25806920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.