Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25806542›Full record

ArticleHeredity2015

Conservatism and novelty in the genetic architecture of adaptation in Heliconius butterflies.

B Huber, A Whibley, Y L Poul, N Navarro, A Martin, S Baxter, A Shah, B Gilles, T Wirth, W O McMillan and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A long noncoding RNA at theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Association mapping of colour variation in a butterfly provides evidence that a supergene locks together a cluster of adaptive loci.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. eLife · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Diversity in warning coloration: selective paradox or the norm?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Macroevolutionary shifts ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Polymorphism at a mimicry supergene maintained by opposing frequency-dependent selection pressures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Waiting in the wings: what can we learn about gene co-option from the diversification of butterfly wing patterns?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

B Huber1] Institut de Systématique, Evolution, et Biodiversité, UMR 7205 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France [2] Laboratoire Biologie Intégrative des Populations, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), Paris, France [3] The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, República de Panamá
A WhibleyInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, et Biodiversité, UMR 7205 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Y L PoulInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, et Biodiversité, UMR 7205 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
N Navarro1] Laboratoire PALEVO, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Dijon, France [2] UMR uB/CNRS 6282-Biogéosciences, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000000156944201
A MartinDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
S Baxter1] School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia [2] Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
A Shah1] Institut de Systématique, Evolution, et Biodiversité, UMR 7205 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France [2] Department of Animal Behaviour, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
B Gilles1] Institut de Systématique, Evolution, et Biodiversité, UMR 7205 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France [2] The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, República de Panamá
T Wirth1] Institut de Systématique, Evolution, et Biodiversité, UMR 7205 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France [2] Laboratoire Biologie Intégrative des Populations, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), Paris, France.
W O McMillanThe Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, República de Panamá
M Joron1] Institut de Systématique, Evolution, et Biodiversité, UMR 7205 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France [2] The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, República de Panamá
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAThe University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G0900740Medical Research Council MR/K001744/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the genetic architecture of adaptive traits has been at the centre of modern evolutionary biology since Fisher; however, evaluating how the genetic architecture of ecologically important traits influences their diversification has been hampered by the scarcity of empirical data. Now, high-throughput genomics facilitates the detailed exploration of variation in the genome-to-phenotype map among closely related taxa. Here, we investigate the evolution of wing pattern diversity in Heliconius, a clade of neotropical butterflies that have undergone an adaptive radiation for wing-pattern mimicry and are influenced by distinct selection regimes. Using crosses between natural wing-pattern variants, we used genome-wide restriction site-associated DNA (RAD) genotyping, traditional linkage mapping and multivariate image analysis to study the evolution of the architecture of adaptive variation in two closely related species: Heliconius hecale and H. ismenius. We implemented a new morphometric procedure for the analysis of whole-wing pattern variation, which allows visualising spatial heatmaps of genotype-to-phenotype association for each quantitative trait locus separately. We used the H. melpomene reference genome to fine-map variation for each major wing-patterning region uncovered, evaluated the role of candidate genes and compared genetic architectures across the genus. Our results show that, although the loci responding to mimicry selection are highly conserved between species, their effect size and phenotypic action vary throughout the clade. Multilocus architecture is ancestral and maintained across species under directional selection, whereas the single-locus (supergene) inheritance controlling polymorphism in H. numata appears to have evolved only once. Nevertheless, the conservatism in the wing-patterning toolkit found throughout the genus does not appear to constrain phenotypic evolution towards local adaptive optima.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsButterfliesChromosome MappingColorCrosses, GeneticGenotypePhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID25806542
PMCPMC4815517
OpenAlexW2151112233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.