Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25806510›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Efficient inference of parsimonious phenomenological models of cellular dynamics using S-systems and alternating regression.

Bryan C Daniels, Ilya Nemenman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Automated, predictive, and interpretable inference ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Robust data-driven discovery of governing physical laws with error bars.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bryan C DanielsCenter for Complexity and Collective Computation, Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53715, USA.
Ilya NemenmanDepartments of Physics and Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nonlinearity of dynamics in systems biology makes it hard to infer them from experimental data. Simple linear models are computationally efficient, but cannot incorporate these important nonlinearities. An adaptive method based on the S-system formalism, which is a sensible representation of nonlinear mass-action kinetics typically found in cellular dynamics, maintains the efficiency of linear regression. We combine this approach with adaptive model selection to obtain efficient and parsimonious representations of cellular dynamics. The approach is tested by inferring the dynamics of yeast glycolysis from simulated data. With little computing time, it produces dynamical models with high predictive power and with structural complexity adapted to the difficulty of the inference problem.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, TheoreticalBayes TheoremComputer SimulationNonlinear DynamicsSystems BiologyYeasts

Identifiers

PMID25806510
PMCPMC4373916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.