Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25806363›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2015

Circulating Strains of Brucella abortus in Cattle in Santo Domingo De Los Tsáchilas Province - Ecuador.

Richar Ivan Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Javier Contreras-Zamora, Washington Benitez Ortiz, Karina Guerrero-Viracocha, Holger Salcan-Guaman, Elizabeth Minda, Lenin Ron Garrido

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The draft genome ofStandards in genomic sciences · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richar Ivan Rodríguez-HidalgoFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Central del Ecuador (UC) , Quito , Ecuador ; Centro Internacional de Zoonosis, Universidad Central del Ecuador (UC) , Quito , Ecuador ; Dirección General de Postgrado, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial , Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas , Ecuador.
Javier Contreras-ZamoraDirección General de Postgrado, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial , Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas , Ecuador.
Washington Benitez OrtizFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Central del Ecuador (UC) , Quito , Ecuador ; Centro Internacional de Zoonosis, Universidad Central del Ecuador (UC) , Quito , Ecuador.
Karina Guerrero-ViracochaDirección General de Postgrado, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial , Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas , Ecuador.
Holger Salcan-GuamanDirección General de Postgrado, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial , Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas , Ecuador.
Elizabeth MindaCentro Internacional de Zoonosis, Universidad Central del Ecuador (UC) , Quito , Ecuador.
Lenin Ron GarridoDepartamento de Ciencias de la Vida y la Agricultura, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas - ESPE, Carrera de Ingeniería en Ciencias Agropecuarias , Sangolqui , Ecuador ; Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador (UC) , Quito , Ecuador.
Universidad UTE · ECCentral University of Ecuador · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Province of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas in Ecuador represents the largest informal cattle market. Because of its strategic position, cattle movement is very high and therefore we selected this region, to determine the strain variation of Brucella sp. Part of the study aimed at the isolation, biotyping, and genotyping of Brucella species from milk and supra-mammary lymph nodes of sero-positive bovines, using selective Farrell medium, biochemical assays, and IS711-PCR, AMOS-PCR, and HOOF-Prints techniques. In total, 656 animals from 12 sero-positive dairy herds and from the provincial slaughterhouse were diagnosed by Rose Bengal and Wright's Slow Agglutination test with EDTA. Amongst these animals, 50 animals were sero-positive for brucellosis. Twenty-five lymph nodes and 25 milk samples from each group of positive reactors were transferred to culture medium. Isolation was possible from 4 (16%) lymph nodes and 9 (36%) milk samples; out of these, 10 isolates were diagnosed as Brucella sp. All four isolates of lymphatic tissue corresponded to Brucella abortus biotype 1, confirmed as field strains by molecular analysis. Milk isolations, showed biochemically a more dispersed pattern in which B. abortus biotypes 1 and 4 were found; yet four samples gave a pattern similar to B. abortus biotype 2; however, only biotypes 1 and 4 were confirmed by molecular analysis. The concordance between biochemical and molecular diagnostic tests reached 76.9%.

Indexed as

Bovine brucellosisBrucella abortusBrucella abortus biotype 1Brucella abortus biotype 4EcuadorVNTR

Identifiers

PMID25806363
PMCPMC4354208
OpenAlexW1974180285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.