Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25806353›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2015

Single cell transcriptomics: methods and applications.

Itamar Kanter, Tomer Kalisky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Impact of single-cell RNA sequencing on understanding immune regulation.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. A contemporary review on the important role ofInformatics in medicine unlocked · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Computational strategies for single-cell multi-omics integration.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Microbial single-cell omics: the crux of the matter.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Itamar KanterFaculty of Engineering, Institute of Nanotechnology, Bar-Ilan University , Ramat Gan , Israel.
Tomer KaliskyFaculty of Engineering, Institute of Nanotechnology, Bar-Ilan University , Ramat Gan , Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, gene expression measurements were performed on "bulk" samples containing populations of thousands of cells. Recent advances in genomic technology have made it possible to measure gene expression in hundreds of individual cells at a time. As a result, cellular properties that were previously masked in "bulk" measurements can now be observed directly. In this review, we will survey emerging technologies for single cell transcriptomics, and describe how they are used to study complex disease such as cancer, as well as other biological phenomena such as tissue regeneration, embryonic development, and immune response.

Indexed as

FISHgene expressionqPCRRNA sequencingsingle cell

Identifiers

PMID25806353
PMCPMC4354386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.