Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25806307›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2014

Recurrence after surgery in patients with NSCLC.

Hidetaka Uramoto, Fumihiro Tanaka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 394 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
394citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

394 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic value of postoperative circulating tumor DNA for recurrence-free survival in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

334 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hidetaka UramotoSecond Department of Surgery, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Fumihiro TanakaSecond Department of Surgery, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery remains the only potentially curative modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and tissue availability is made possible. However, a proportion of lung cancer patients develop recurrence, even after curative resection. This review discusses the superiority of surgery, the reasons for recurrence, the timing and pattern of recurrence, the identification of factors related to recurrence, current provisions for treatment and perspectives about surgery for patients with NSCLC.

Indexed as

disease-free survival (DFS)non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Recurrencerelapsesurgery

Identifiers

PMID25806307
PMCPMC4367696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.