Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25806244›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2013

Non-neuronal cholinergic system in airways and lung cancer susceptibility.

Laura Saracino, Michele Zorzetto, Simona Inghilleri, Ernesto Pozzi, Giulia Maria Stella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura SaracinoLaboratory of Biochemistry & Genetics, Division of Pneumology, University and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia 27100, Italy ;
Michele ZorzettoLaboratory of Biochemistry & Genetics, Division of Pneumology, University and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia 27100, Italy ;
Simona InghilleriLaboratory of Biochemistry & Genetics, Division of Pneumology, University and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia 27100, Italy ;
Ernesto PozziPoliclinico di Monza, University of Pavia, Monza 20025, Italy.
Giulia Maria StellaLaboratory of Biochemistry & Genetics, Division of Pneumology, University and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia 27100, Italy ;
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the airway tract acetylcholine (ACh) is known to be the mediator of the parasympathetic nervous system. However ACh is also synthesized by a large variety of non-neuronal cells. Strongest expression is documented in neuroendocrine and in epithelial cells (ciliated, basal and secretory elements). Growing evidence suggests that a cell-type specific Ach expression and release do exist and act with local autoparacrine loop in the non-neuronal airway compartment. Here we review the molecular mechanism by which Ach is involved in regulating various aspects of innate mucosal defense, including mucociliary clearance, regulation of macrophage activation as well as in promoting epithelial cells proliferation and conferring susceptibility to lung carcinoma onset. Importantly this non-neuronal cholinergic machinery is differently regulated than the neuronal one and could be specifically therapeutically targeted.

Indexed as

actionable targetcancer susceptibilityCholinergic systeminnate defensenon-neuronal compartment

Identifiers

PMID25806244
PMCPMC4367621
OpenAlexW2190363204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.