Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25806041›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Improved evidence-based genome-scale metabolic models for maize leaf, embryo, and endosperm.

Samuel M D Seaver, Louis M T Bradbury, Océane Frelin, Raphy Zarecki, Eytan Ruppin, Andrew D Hanson, Christopher S Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Elucidating the impact ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Exploring synergies between plant metabolic modelling and machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Current Challenges in Plant Systems Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel M D SeaverMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL, USA ; Computation Institute, The University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA.
Louis M T BradburyHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA ; Department of Biology, York College, City University of New York New York, NY, USA.
Océane FrelinHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Raphy ZareckiSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eytan RuppinSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.
Andrew D HansonHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Christopher S HenryMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL, USA ; Computation Institute, The University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing demand for genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for plants, fueled by the need to understand the metabolic basis of crop yield and by progress in genome and transcriptome sequencing. Methods are also required to enable the interpretation of plant transcriptome data to study how cellular metabolic activity varies under different growth conditions or even within different organs, tissues, and developmental stages. Such methods depend extensively on the accuracy with which genes have been mapped to the biochemical reactions in the plant metabolic pathways. Errors in these mappings lead to metabolic reconstructions with an inflated number of reactions and possible generation of unreliable metabolic phenotype predictions. Here we introduce a new evidence-based genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of maize, with significant improvements in the quality of the gene-reaction associations included within our model. We also present a new approach for applying our model to predict active metabolic genes based on transcriptome data. This method includes a minimal set of reactions associated with low expression genes to enable activity of a maximum number of reactions associated with high expression genes. We apply this method to construct an organ-specific model for the maize leaf, and tissue specific models for maize embryo and endosperm cells. We validate our models using fluxomics data for the endosperm and embryo, demonstrating an improved capacity of our models to fit the available fluxomics data. All models are publicly available via the DOE Systems Biology Knowledgebase and PlantSEED, and our new method is generally applicable for analysis transcript profiles from any plant, paving the way for further in silico studies with a wide variety of plant genomes.

Indexed as

flux balance analysismetabolic networksplant metabolismsystems biologytranscriptomicsZea mays

Identifiers

PMID25806041
PMCPMC4354304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.