Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25806035›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Introducing a sensor to measure budburst and its environmental drivers.

George J Kleinknecht, Heather E Lintz, Anton Kruger, James J Niemeier, Michael J Salino-Hugg, Christoph K Thomas, Christopher J Still, Youngil Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

George J KleinknechtOregon Climate Change Research Institute, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA ; College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR, USA.
Heather E LintzOregon Climate Change Research Institute, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA ; College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR, USA.
Anton KrugerIIHR-Hydroscience and Engineering, College of Engineering, The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA, USA.
James J NiemeierIIHR-Hydroscience and Engineering, College of Engineering, The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA, USA.
Michael J Salino-HuggIIHR-Hydroscience and Engineering, College of Engineering, The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA, USA.
Christoph K ThomasCollege of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR, USA ; Department of Micrometeorology, University of Bayreuth Bayreuth, Germany.
Christopher J StillDepartment of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA.
Youngil KimDepartment of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Budburst is a key adaptive trait that can help us understand how plants respond to a changing climate from the molecular to landscape scale. Despite this, acquisition of budburst data is constrained by a lack of information at the plant scale on the environmental stimuli associated with the release of bud dormancy. Additionally, to date, little effort has been devoted to phenotyping plants in natural populations due to the challenge of accounting for the effect of environmental variation. Nonetheless, natural selection operates on natural populations, and investigation of adaptive phenotypes in situ is warranted and can validate results from controlled laboratory experiments. To identify genomic effects on individual plant phenotypes in nature, environmental drivers must be concurrently measured, and characterized. Here, we designed and evaluated a sensor to meet these requirements for temperate woody plants. It was designed for use on a tree branch to measure the timing of budburst together with its key environmental drivers; temperature, and photoperiod. Specifically, we evaluated the sensor through independent corroboration with time-lapse photography and a suite of environmental sampling instruments. We also tested whether the presence of the device on a branch influenced the timing of budburst. Our results indicated the following: the temperatures measured by the budburst sensor's digital thermometer closely approximated the temperatures measured using a thermocouple touching plant tissue; the photoperiod detector measured ambient light with the same accuracy as did time lapse photography; the budburst sensor accurately detected the timing of budburst; and the sensor itself did not influence the budburst timing of Populus clones. Among other potential applications, future use of the sensor may provide plant phenotyping at the landscape level for integration with landscape genomics.

Indexed as

budburstclimate changephenologyphenotypingphotoperiodsensingtemperature

Identifiers

PMID25806035
PMCPMC4354302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.