Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25805982›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2015

Across the consciousness continuum-from unresponsive wakefulness to sleep.

Christine Blume, Renata Del Giudice, Malgorzata Wislowska, Julia Lechinger, Manuel Schabus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sleep/Wake Modulation of Polysomnographic Patterns has Prognostic Value in Pediatric Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine BlumeLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria ; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg (CCNS), University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria.
Renata Del GiudiceLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria ; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg (CCNS), University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria.
Malgorzata WislowskaLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria.
Julia LechingerLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria ; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg (CCNS), University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria.
Manuel SchabusLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria ; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg (CCNS), University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 934Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1233Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in the development of new paradigms as well as in neuroimaging techniques nowadays enable us to make inferences about the level of consciousness patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) retain. They, moreover, allow to predict their probable development. Today, we know that certain brain responses (e.g., event-related potentials or oscillatory changes) to stimulation, circadian rhythmicity, the presence or absence of sleep patterns as well as measures of resting state brain activity can serve the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation process. Still, the paradigms we are using nowadays do not allow to disentangle VS/UWS and minimally conscious state (MCS) patients with the desired reliability and validity. Furthermore, even rather well-established methods have, unfortunately, not found their way into clinical routine yet. We here review current literature as well as recent findings from our group and discuss how neuroimaging methods (fMRI, PET) and particularly electroencephalography (EEG) can be used to investigate cognition in DOC or even to assess the degree of residual awareness. We, moreover, propose that circadian rhythmicity and sleep in brain-injured patients are promising fields of research in this context.

Indexed as

circadian rhythmsdisorders of consciousness (DOC)electroencephalography (EEG)resting statesleep

Identifiers

PMID25805982
PMCPMC4354375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.