Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25805920›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Update on the management of pancreatic cancer: surgery is not enough.

Daniel Ansari, Adam Gustafsson, Roland Andersson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readEditorialReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03959150 (A Multi-center, II Phase,Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Capecitabine Metronomic Chemotherapy After Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Standard Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II/III Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03959150 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Multi-center, II Phase,Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Capecitabine Metronomic Chemotherapy After Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Standard Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II/III Pancreatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2020 to 2023Enrolled231ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmsCapecitabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel AnsariDaniel Ansari, Adam Gustafsson, Roland Andersson, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Adam GustafssonDaniel Ansari, Adam Gustafsson, Roland Andersson, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Roland AnderssonDaniel Ansari, Adam Gustafsson, Roland Andersson, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents the fourth cause of death in cancer and has a 5-year survival of < 5%. Only about 15% of the patients present with a resectable PDAC with potential to undergo "curative" surgery. After surgery, local and systemic recurrence, is though very common. The median survival of resected patients with adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery is only 20-23 mo. This underscores the significant need to improve PDAC management strategies. Increased survival rate is dependent on new breakthroughs in our understanding of not at least tumor biology. The aim of this review is to update and comment on recent knowledge concerning PDAC biology and new diagnostics and treatment modalities. One fundamental approach to improve survival rates is by earlier and improved diagnosis of the disease. In recent years, novel blood-based biomarkers have emerged based on genetic, epigenetic and protein changes in PDAC with very promising results. For biomarkers to enter clinical practice they need to have been developed using adequate control groups and provide high sensitivity and specificity and by this identify patients at risk already in a pre-symptomatic stage. Another way to improve outcomes, is by employing neoadjuvant treatments thereby increasing the number of resectable cases. Novel systemic treatment regimes like FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel have demonstrated improvements in prolonging survival in advanced cases, but long-term survival is still scarce. The future improved understanding of PDAC biology will inevitably render new treatment options directed against both the cancer cells and the surrounding microenvironment.

Indexed as

PancreatectomyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalChemotherapy, AdjuvantEarly Detection of CancerHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualPancreatic NeoplasmsPatient SelectionPrecision MedicinePredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapyDiagnosisEpigeneticsGeneticsPancreatic cancerPrognostic modelsProteomicsStromaSurgery

Identifiers

PMID25805920
PMCPMC4363743
OpenAlexW1895088121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.