Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25805527›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2015

Laparoscopic assistance for primary transanal pull-through in Hirschsprung's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

David Thomson, Benjamin Allin, Anna-May Long, Tim Bradnock, Gregor Walker, Marian Knight

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. NETSArchives of disease in childhood · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surgical management of short-segment Hirschsprung disease.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2024
    Review
  14. Controversies in Hirschsprung surgery.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David ThomsonNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Benjamin AllinNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anna-May LongNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tim BradnockDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, UK.
Gregor WalkerDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, UK.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBRoyal Hospital for Children · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare outcomes following totally transanal endorectal pull-through (TTERPT) versus pull-through with any form of laparoscopic assistance (LAPT) for infants with uncomplicated Hirschsprung's disease.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

settingFive hospitals with a paediatric surgical service.

participants405 infants with uncomplicated Hirschsprung's disease.

interventionsTTERPT versus LAPT. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: PRIMARY OUTCOMES: mortality, postoperative enterocolitis, faecal incontinence, constipation, unplanned laparotomy or stoma formation, and injury to abdominal viscera. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Haemorrhage requiring transfusion of blood products, abscess formation, intestinal obstruction, intestinal ischaemia, enteric fistula formation, urinary incontinence or retention, impotency and duration of procedure.

resultsFive eligible studies comprising 405 patients were identified from 2107 studies. All studies were retrospective case series, with variability in outcome assessment quality and length of follow-up. Operative duration was 50.29 min shorter with TTERPT (95% CI 39.83 to 60.74, p<0.00001). There were no significant differences identified between TTERPT and LAPT for incidence of postoperative enterocolitis (OR=0.78, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.38, p=0.39), faecal incontinence (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.20, p=0.32) or constipation (OR=0.84, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.17, p=0.71).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis did not find any evidence to suggest a higher rate of enterocolitis, incontinence or constipation following TTERPT compared with LAPT. Further long-term comparative studies and multicentre data pooling are needed to determine whether a purely transanal approach offers any advantages over a laparoscopically assisted approach to rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO registry- CRD42013005698.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsAnal CanalColonDigestive System Surgical ProceduresHirschsprung DiseaseHumansInfantLaparoscopyMegacolonHirschsprung diseaselaparoscopymeta-analysispull-throughtransanal

Identifiers

PMID25805527
PMCPMC4386272
OpenAlexW2042867052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.