Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25805450›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015

Palliative care in patients with ovarian cancer and bowel obstruction.

Alberto Daniele, A Ferrero, L Fuso, M Mineccia, V Porcellana, D Vassallo, N Biglia, G Menato

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03260647 (Risk Stratified Multidisciplinary Ambulatory Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03260647 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Risk Stratified Multidisciplinary Ambulatory Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction (MAMBO) Program for Women With Advanced Gynecological Cancers

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2017 to 2024Enrolled96ConditionsGynecologic CancerArmsManagement algorithm for Malignant Bowel Obstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto DanieleAcademic Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, Via Magellano,1, 10128, Turin, Italy. albertodaniele@hotmail.it.
A FerreroAcademic Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, Via Magellano,1, 10128, Turin, Italy.
L FusoAcademic Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, Via Magellano,1, 10128, Turin, Italy.
M MinecciaDepartment of Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Via Magellano,1, 10128, Turin, Italy.
V PorcellanaService of Palliative Care, Mauriziano Hospital, Via Magellano,1, 10128, Turin, Italy.
D VassalloService of Dietetics, Mauriziano Hospital, Via Magellano,1, 10128, Turin, Italy.
N BigliaAcademic Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, Via Magellano,1, 10128, Turin, Italy.
G MenatoAcademic Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, Via Magellano,1, 10128, Turin, Italy.
A. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMalignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is usually a pre-terminal event in patients with ovarian cancer. However, because of the lack of data in literature, decisions around surgical intervention, non-resectional procedures, or medical treatment of MBO in patients with ovarian cancer cannot be lightly undertaken. We analyzed medical and surgical procedures, performance status, nutritional status, cachexia, and their prognostic value in this group of patients.

methodsWe retrospectively selected all consecutive patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who received medical or surgical treatment for MBO between October 2008 and January 2014 at the Academic Department of Gynecological Oncology of Mauriziano Hospital of Turin (Italy).

resultsWe found 40 patients: 18 of them underwent medical treatment and 22 of them were submitted to surgery. In the group of surgery, the hospitalization was shorter (p 0.02), the pain reduction was more effective (p 0.001), the number of chemotherapy lines was higher (p 0.03), and re-obstruction was more rare (p 0.02). Between the two groups, we did not find any differences in post-palliation episodes of vomit (p 0.83), type of diet (p 0.34), ability to return home (p 0.72), and death setting (p 0.28). Median survival after palliation was longer in the group of surgery (p 0.025). Cachexia, low performance status, and poor nutritional status were significant predictors of worse survival after MBO, independently by the treatment.

conclusionsSurgery has to be considered in patients without serious contraindications; otherwise, a medical protocol, including antisecretory drugs, is the standard of care in frail patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCachexiaCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansIntestinal ObstructionItalyMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPainPalliative CarePrognosisRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesMalignant bowel obstructionOvarian cancerPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID25805450
OpenAlexW2011775775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.