Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25805405›Full record

Trial reportJournal of affective disorders2015

Positive imagery cognitive bias modification (CBM) and internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT): a randomized controlled trial.

Alishia D Williams, Kathleen O'Moore, Simon E Blackwell, Jessica Smith, Emily A Holmes, Gavin Andrews

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of affective disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Distinct Effects of Anxiety and Depression on Updating Emotional Information in Working Memory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Anhedonia in tobacco withdrawal among African-American smokers.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Depression: A cognitive perspective.Clinical psychology review · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alishia D WilliamsSchool of Psychiatry, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), St. Vincent׳s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: alishia.williams@unsw.edu.au.
Kathleen O'MooreClinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), St. Vincent׳s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Simon E BlackwellMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Jessica SmithClinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), St. Vincent׳s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Emily A HolmesMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gavin AndrewsSchool of Psychiatry, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), St. Vincent׳s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_0901/1Wellcome Trust WT088217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccruing evidence suggests that positive imagery-based cognitive bias modification (CBM) could have potential as a standalone targeted intervention for depressive symptoms or as an adjunct to existing treatments. We sought to establish the benefit of this form of CBM when delivered prior to Internet cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) for depression

methodsA randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a 1-week Internet-delivered positive CBM vs. an active control condition for participants (N=75, 69% female, mean age=42) meeting diagnostic criteria for major depression; followed by a 10-week iCBT program for both groups.

resultsModified intent-to-treat marginal and mixed effect models demonstrated no significant difference between conditions following the CBM intervention or the iCBT program. In both conditions there were significant reductions (Cohen׳s d .57-1.58, 95% CI=.12-2.07) in primary measures of depression and interpretation bias (PHQ9, BDI-II, AST-D). Large effect size reductions (Cohen׳s d .81-1.32, 95% CI=.31-1.79) were observed for secondary measures of distress, disability, anxiety and repetitive negative thinking (K10, WHODAS, STAI, RTQ). Per protocol analyses conducted in the sample of participants who completed all seven sessions of CBM indicated between-group superiority of the positive over control group on depression symptoms (PHQ9, BDI-II) and psychological distress (K10) following CBM (Hedges g .55-.88, 95% CI=-.03-1.46) and following iCBT (PHQ9, K10). The majority (>70%) no longer met diagnostic criteria for depression at 3-month follow-up. LIMITATIONS: The control condition contained many active components and therefore may have represented a smaller 'dose' of the positive condition.

conclusionsResults provide preliminary support for the successful integration of imagery-based CBM into an existing Internet-based treatment for depression.

Indexed as

Imagery, PsychotherapyInternetAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeCognitive-bias modification (CBM)DepressionInternet-based therapy (iCBT)Major depressive disorderMental imageryRandomized controlled trial (RCT)

Identifiers

PMID25805405
PMCPMC4407900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.