ArticleMicrobes and infection2015
Interkingdom networking within the oral microbiome.
Article in Microbes and infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quorum sensing inFrontiers in oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Voices of Eukaryotic Microbes: Chemical Communication Via Quorum Sensing.Microbial ecology · 2026Review
- Host-pathogen interactions in periodontitis: an integrative interkingdom perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Multi-way modelling of oral microbial dynamics and host-microbiome interactions during induced gingivitis.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Secreted Aspartic Proteinases: Key Factors inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Periodontal pathogens and obesity in the context of cardiovascular risks across age groups.Frontiers in oral health · 2024Article
- Social networking at the microbiome-host interface.Infection and immunity · 2023Review
- The Role of the Oral Microbiome in the Development of Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Advances in the oral microbiota and rapid detection of oral infectious diseases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Exploiting Conserved Quorum Sensing Signals in Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus pneumoniaeMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Functional biomes beyond the bacteriome in the oral ecosystem.The Japanese dental science review · 2022Review
- Cross-kingdom interaction betweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- The interactions between oral-gut axis microbiota andFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Oral microbiota in the oral-genitourinary axis: identifying periodontitis as a potential risk of genitourinary cancers.Military Medical Research · 2021Review
- Understanding the Matrix: The Role of Extracellular DNA in Oral Biofilms.Frontiers in oral health · 2021Review
- A nanocarrier system that potentiates the effect of miconazole within different interkingdom biofilms.Journal of oral microbiology · 2020Article
- Spatial Design of Polymicrobial Oral Biofilm in Its Native Disease State.Journal of dental research · 2020Article
- Peptidylarginine Deiminase ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Oral Candidiasis: A Disease of Opportunity.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Different sites within the oropharynx harbour unique microbial communities. Co-evolution of microbes and host has resulted in complex interkingdom circuitries. Metabolic signalling is crucial to these processes, and novel microbial communication factors are progressively being discovered. Resolving interkingdom networks will lead to better understanding of oral health or disease aetiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.