ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2016
[Catecholamines: pro and contra].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Prognostic relevance of tissue oxygen saturation in patients in the early stage of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019Trial
- [65/m in cardiogenic shock : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 1].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
- [Neuraxial anesthesia procedures in the perioperative management of pulmonary hypertension : A literature review with two case reports].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Review
- Multivalent stimulation of βNanoscale advances · 2022Article
- [Pharmacological therapy of circulatory shock].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021Article
- [More negative than positive effects: adrenaline for cardiogenic shock].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018Article
- [Reimbursement of intensive care services in the German DRG system : Current problems and possible solutions].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018Article
- [Levosimendan-no effect on multiorgan failure in septic shock].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCatecholamines with vasopressor and inotropic effects are commonly used in intensive care medicine. The aim of this review is to explain some of the physiologic actions on which a catecholamine therapy is based, but also to elucidate the risks which are associated with an uncritical and excessive use of these drugs. SIDE EFFECTS: Emphasis is placed on the myocardial damage triggered by adrenergic overstimulation. There is considerable evidence that in conditions of severe heart failure, myocardial ischemia as well as cardiogenic and septic shock especially the use of catecholamines with predominant β-adrenergic effects (epinephrine, dobutamine, dopamine) can have a negative clinical impact. A simple cardiac risk marker might be a tachycardia. ADMINISTRATION: Vasopressor therapy with norepinephrine, based on individually applied perfusion parameters (e.g., urine output, lactate), however, seems justified in many conditions of shock and hemodynamic instability during deep analgosedation. In terms of a cardioprotective therapy, the administration of catecholamines, however, should always be reevaluated and titrated to the minimum deemed necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.