Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25804345›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2015

The laboratory domestication of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Mark G Sterken, L Basten Snoek, Jan E Kammenga, Erik C Andersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A gap-free, telomere-to-telomere genome assembly for thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evolution of developmental bias explains divergent patterns of phenotypic evolution in two nematode clades.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. CGC1, a new reference genome forGenome research · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark G SterkenLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Virology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
L Basten SnoekLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jan E KammengaLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: jan.kammenga@wur.nl.
Erik C AndersenDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. Electronic address: erik.andersen@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
Determination of the distribution of fitness effects of mutations in C. elegansR01GM107227 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BAER, CHARLES F · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107227NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM107227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model organisms are of great importance to our understanding of basic biology and to making advances in biomedical research. However, the influence of laboratory cultivation on these organisms is underappreciated, and especially how that environment can affect research outcomes. Recent experiments led to insights into how the widely used laboratory reference strain of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans compares with natural strains. Here we describe potential selective pressures that led to the fixation of laboratory-derived alleles for the genes npr-1, glb-5, and nath-10. These alleles influence a large number of traits, resulting in behaviors that affect experimental interpretations. Furthermore, strong phenotypic effects caused by these laboratory-derived alleles hinder the discovery of natural alleles. We highlight strategies to reduce the influence of laboratory-derived alleles and to harness the full power of C. elegans.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAdaptation, BiologicalAllelesAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansGene-Environment InteractionGenetic VariationaerotaxisCaenorhabditis eleganslaboratory derivednpr-1selection

Identifiers

PMID25804345
PMCPMC4417040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.