Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25803768›Full record

ReviewJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2015

Challenges to integrating pharmacogenetic testing into medication therapy management.

Susanne B Haga, Nancy M Allen LaPointe, Jivan Moaddeb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. How to Implement a Pharmacogenetics Service at your Institution.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Medication Therapy Management: Current Challenges.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2020
    Review
  11. Polypharmacy: a healthcare conundrum with a pharmacogenetic solution.Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susanne B HagaDuke University School of Medicine, 304 Research Dr., Box 90141, Durham, NC 27708. susanne.haga@duke.edu.
Nancy M Allen LaPointe
Jivan Moaddeb

Funding

Pharmacogenetic Testing: Challenges of Clinical IntegrationR01GM081416 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAGA, SUSANNE · 2008 to 2018
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081416NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081416A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some have proposed the integration of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing into medication therapy management (MTM) to enable further refinement of treatments to reduce risk of adverse responses and improve efficacy. PGx testing involves the analysis of genetic variants associated with therapeutic or adverse response and may be useful in enhancing the ability to identify ineffective and/or harmful drugs or drug combinations. This "enhanced" MTM might also reduce patient concerns about side effects and increase confidence that the medication is effective, addressing 2 key factors that impact patient adherence: concern and necessity. However, the feasibility and effectiveness of the integration of PGx testing into MTM in clinical practice has not yet been determined. In this commentary, we consider some of the challenges to the integration and delivery of PGx testing in MTM services.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesGenetic TestingHumansMedication Therapy ManagementPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacogeneticsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID25803768
PMCPMC4522310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.