Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25803711›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Multimodal holographic microscopy: distinction between apoptosis and oncosis.

Jan Balvan, Aneta Krizova, Jaromir Gumulec, Martina Raudenska, Zbysek Sladek, Miroslava Sedlackova, Petr Babula, Marketa Sztalmachova, Rene Kizek, Radim Chmelik and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early Detection of Cell Death Using Transmembrane Water Exchange Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of CoFeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Potential Otubain1 Inhibitor, an Approach for a Treatment against Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ruthenium (II)/allopurinol complex inhibits breast cancer progression via multiple targets.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jan BalvanDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
Aneta KrizovaCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic; TESCAN Brno, s.r.o., Brno, Czech Republic.
Jaromir GumulecDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martina RaudenskaDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
Zbysek SladekDepartment of Morphology, Physiology, and Animal Genetics, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Miroslava SedlackovaDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr BabulaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marketa SztalmachovaDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
Rene KizekCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Radim ChmelikCentral European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic; Institute of Physical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
Michal MasarikDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of specific cell death is of a great value for many scientists. Predominant types of cell death can be detected by flow-cytometry (FCM). Nevertheless, the absence of cellular morphology analysis leads to the misclassification of cell death type due to underestimated oncosis. However, the definition of the oncosis is important because of its potential reversibility. Therefore, FCM analysis of cell death using annexin V/propidium iodide assay was compared with holographic microscopy coupled with fluorescence detection - "Multimodal holographic microscopy (MHM)". The aim was to highlight FCM limitations and to point out MHM advantages. It was shown that the annexin V+/PI- phenotype is not specific of early apoptotic cells, as previously believed, and that morphological criteria have to be necessarily combined with annexin V/PI for the cell death type to be ascertained precisely. MHM makes it possible to distinguish oncosis clearly from apoptosis and to stratify the progression of oncosis.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalHolographyHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceMultimodal ImagingNecrosisPhenotypeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25803711
PMCPMC4372376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.