Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25803694›Full record

Trial reportAIDS care2015

Development and evaluation of a web-based assent for adolescents considering an HIV vaccine trial.

Diane R Blake, Celeste A Lemay, Louise S Maranda, J Dennis Fortenberry, Margaret H Kearney, Kathleen M Mazor

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Assessment of Consent Comprehension Among Kenyan Adolescents, Young Adults, and Parents: Comparison of Enhanced and Standard Consenting Procedures.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Co-creation of information materials within the assent process: From theory to practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Replacing Paper Informed Consent with Electronic Informed Consent for Research in Academic Medical Centers: A Scoping Review.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diane R Blakea Department of Pediatrics , University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester , MA , USA.
Celeste A Lemay
Louise S Maranda
J Dennis Fortenberry
Margaret H Kearney
Kathleen M Mazor

Funding

Computerized HIV Vaccine Trial Assent: Will It Improve Adolescent Comprehension?R21HD057786 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BLAKE, DIANE R · 2008 to 2009
$427k
NICHD NIH HHS 1R21HD057786-01NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD057786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV vaccine trials with minors will likely require parental permission and informed assent from adolescents. For this to be a valid process, the information needs to be presented in a manner that promotes adolescent comprehension. Previous studies suggest that adolescent comprehension of assent is often insufficient. We developed an interactive web-based assent that included interspersed quiz questions for a hypothetical HIV vaccine trial. Efficacy of the web-based assent was compared to a standard paper assent with and without interspersed questions. One hundred twenty teen participants, ages 15-17 years, from five community organizations were randomized to self-administered web-based assent (n=60) or investigator-administered paper assent with (n=29) or without (n=31) interspersed quiz questions. After reviewing the assent, participants completed a 27-item comprehension test. Comprehension scores were compared between groups. The mean number of correctly answered questions were 21.2 for the full paper group and 21.1 for the web-based group (t118=-0.08, p=0.94). Scores were 20.2 for the paper without interspersed questions sub-group and 22.1 for the paper with interspersed questions sub-group (t58=1.96, p=0.055). Participants in the web-based group performed as well on the comprehension test as those in the paper group, and those in the paper with questions sub-group performed better than those in the paper without questions sub-group, suggesting that interspersed quiz questions may improve understanding of a traditional paper assent. The minimal investigator time and standardized administration of the web-based assent as well as ability to tailor the assent discussion to topics identified by incorrect comprehension test responses are advantages worthy of further investigation.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesComprehensionInformed ConsentInternetAdolescentFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInformed Consent By MinorsMaleProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationAIDS Vaccinesadolescenceclinical trialscomputer-assisted instructionHIV infection and AIDSinformed consentresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID25803694
PMCPMC4425609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.