Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25803542›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.

Carolina O Nastri, Sarah F Lensen, Ahmed Gibreel, Nick Raine-Fenning, Rui A Ferriani, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Wellington P Martins

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02409745 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Effectiveness of Endometrial Injury in Different Phase of Menstrual Cycle:a Prospective Controlled Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityRan2015 to 2016Enrolled400ConditionsInfertilityArmsendometrial scratch
NCT03108157 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Endometrial Scratch Effect on Pregnancy Rates When Performed During the Previous Cycle of Embryo Transfer in Patients Undergoing Egg-donation IVF

TypeinterventionalSponsorProcreatecRan2017 to 2019Enrolled352ConditionsEMBRYO IMPLANTATIONArmsEndometrial scratch
NCT03660735 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The PIP Study- Pre- IVF Immune Profiling Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2018 to 2021Enrolled250ConditionsSub-fertility, Recurrent Implantation Failure
NCT04363879 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing Two Types of Endometrial Activation Prior to Embryo Transfer: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2014 to 2017Enrolled195ConditionsInfertility, Endometrial DisorderArmsEndometrial scratch with Pipelle curette, Endometrial scratch with Shepard catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 284 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Endometrial injury in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Assisted reproductive technology: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Carolina O NastriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas da FMRP-USP, 8 andar, Campus Universitario da USP, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 14048-900.
Sarah F Lensen
Ahmed Gibreel
Nick Raine-Fenning
Rui A Ferriani
Siladitya Bhattacharya
Wellington P Martins
Universidade de São Paulo · BRAberdeen Maternity Hospital · GBMansoura University · EGUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplantation of an embryo within the endometrial cavity is a critical step in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Previous research has suggested that endometrial injury - intentional damage to the endometrium - can increase the probability of pregnancy in women undergoing ART.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of endometrial injury performed before embryo transfer in women undergoing ART. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and ClinicalTrials.gov. The original search was performed in November 2011, and further searches were done in March 2014 and January 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing intentional endometrial injury before embryo transfer in women undergoing ART, versus no intervention or a sham procedure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent review authors screened studies and extracted data which were checked by a third review author. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias. We contacted and corresponded with study investigators as required and analysed data using risk ratio (RR) and a random-effects model. We assessed the quality of the evidence by using GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. MAIN

resultsWe included 14 trials that included 1063 women in the intervention groups and 1065 women in the control groups. Thirteen studies compared endometrial injury performed between day 7 of the previous cycle and day 7 of the embryo transfer (ET) cycle versus no injury, and one study compared endometrial injury on the day of oocyte retrieval versus no injury. Overall, eight of the 14 included studies were deemed to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain.In studies comparing endometrial injury performed between day 7 of the previous cycle and day 7 of the ET cycle versus no intervention or a sham procedure, endometrial injury was associated with an increase in live birth or ongoing pregnancy rate: RR 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 1.85; P value 0.01; nine RCTs; 1496 women; I² = 53%; moderate-quality evidence. In other words, moderate-quality evidence suggests that if 26% of women achieve live birth without endometrial injury, between 28% and 48% will achieve live birth with endometrial injury. A sensitivity analysis removing the studies at high risk of bias showed no difference in effect.There was no evidence of an effect on miscarriage, however the evidence is of low-quality: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.53; P value 0.06; eight RCTs; 500 clinical pregnancies; I² = 10%; low-quality evidence.Endometrial injury was also associated with an increased clinical pregnancy rate: RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.61; P value 0.002; 13 RCTs; 1972 women; I² = 45%; moderate-quality evidence. This suggests that if 30% of women achieve clinical pregnancy without endometrial injury, between 33% and 48% will achieve clinical pregnancy with this intervention.Endometrial injury was associated with increased pain, however the evidence was of very low quality. One study reported pain on a VAS scale: MD 4.60, 95% CI 3.98 to 5.22; P value < 0.00001; one RCT; 158 women. Two studies reported the number of pain complaints after the procedure; one recorded no events in either group, and the other reported that endometrial injury increased pain complaints: OR 8.65, 95% CI 2.49 to 30.10; P value 0.0007; one RCT; 101 women.Results from the only randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing endometrial injury on the day of oocyte retrieval versus no injury, reported that this endometrial injury markedly decreased live birth (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.69; P value 0.004; 156 women; low-quality evidence) and clinical pregnancy (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.71; P value 0.003; one RCT; 156 women; low-quality evidence). AUTHORS'

conclusionsModerate-quality evidence indicates that endometrial injury performed between day 7 of the previous cycle and day 7 of the embryo transfer (ET) cycle is associated with an improvement in live birth and clinical pregnancy rates in women with more than two previous embryo transfers. There is no evidence of an effect on miscarriage, multiple pregnancy or bleeding. The procedure is mildly painful. Endometrial injury on the day of oocyte retrieval is associated with a reduction of clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates.Although current evidence suggests some benefit of endometrial injury, we need evidence from well-designed trials that avoid instrumentation of the uterus in the preceding three months, do not cause endometrial damage in the control group, stratify the results for women with and without recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and report live birth.

Indexed as

Live BirthPregnancy RateReproductive Techniques, AssistedAbortion, SpontaneousEmbryo ImplantationEndometriumFemaleHumansOdds RatioOocyte RetrievalOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy, MultipleProbabilityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25803542
OpenAlexW1488278893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.