Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25803034›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Autonomously folding protein fragments reveal differences in the energy landscapes of homologous RNases H.

Laura E Rosen, Susan Marqusee

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary trend toward kinetic stability in the folding trajectory of RNases H.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura E RosenBiophysics Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States of America; California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences - Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
Susan MarquseeBiophysics Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States of America; California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences - Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America; Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING GRANTT32GM008295 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HURLEY, JAMES H, WEMMER, DAVID E · 1989 to 2022
$8.1M
Sequence and Environmental Determinants of the Protein Energy LandscapeR01GM050945 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MARQUSEE, SUSAN · 1999 to 2022
$7.4M
Proposal for Central California 900 MHZ NMR SpectrometerP41GM068933 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WEMMER, DAVID E · 2003 to 2007
$5.9M
FOLDING OF THE ACID STATE, SUBDOMAINS AND INTACT RNASE HR29GM050945 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MARQUSEE, SUSAN · 1994 to 1998
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM50945NIGMS NIH HHS GM68933NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM068933NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050945NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important approach to understanding how a protein sequence encodes its energy landscape is to compare proteins with different sequences that fold to the same general native structure. In this work, we compare E. coli and T. thermophilus homologs of the protein RNase H. Using protein fragments, we create equilibrium mimics of two different potential partially-folded intermediates (I(core) and I(core+1)) hypothesized to be present on the energy landscapes of these two proteins. We observe that both T. thermophilus RNase H (ttRNH) fragments are folded and have distinct stabilities, indicating that both regions are capable of autonomous folding and that both intermediates are present as local minima on the ttRNH energy landscape. In contrast, the two E. coli RNase H (ecRNH) fragments have very similar stabilities, suggesting that the presence of additional residues in the I(core+1) fragment does not affect the folding or structure as compared to I(core). NMR experiments provide additional evidence that only the I(core) intermediate is populated by ecRNH. This is one of the biggest differences that has been observed between the energy landscapes of these two proteins. Additionally, we used a FRET experiment in the background of full-length ttRNH to specifically monitor the formation of the I(core+1) intermediate. We determine that the ttRNH I(core+1) intermediate is likely the intermediate populated prior to the rate-limiting barrier to global folding, in contrast to E. coli RNase H for which I(core) is the folding intermediate. This result provides new insight into the nature of the rate-limiting barrier for the folding of RNase H.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularEscherichia coliFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProtein StabilityRibonuclease HSpecies SpecificityThermus thermophilusRibonuclease H

Identifiers

PMID25803034
PMCPMC4372590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.