ArticlePeerJ2015
Evolution of a research field-a micro (RNA) example.
Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Circular RNA: Current Status and Future Directions.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- miRNA-protein-metabolite interaction network reveals the regulatory network and players of pregnancy regulation in dairy cows.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Network Visualization Analysis on MicroRNAs in Infectious Diseases Research Area.Oman medical journal · 2023Article
- The top 100 most-cited papers in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: A bibliometric study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- MicroRNA Expression Profiles and Breast Cancer Chemotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The Role of MicroRNA as Clinical Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Surgery and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The top 100 most-cited papers in long non-coding RNAs: a bibliometric study.Cancer biology & therapy · 2021Article
- Genome-wide analysis of primary microRNA expression using H3K36me3 ChIP-seq data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Comprehensive analysis of blood cells and plasma identifies tissue-specific miRNAs as potential novel circulating biomarkers in cattle.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Changes in circulating microRNA levels can be identified as early as day 8 of pregnancy in cattle.PloS one · 2017Article
- Exploring circulating micro-RNA in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer.International journal of cancer · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background. Every new scientific field can be traced back to a single, seminal publication. Therefore, a bibliometric analysis can yield significant insights into the history and potential future of a research field. This year marks 21 years since that first ground-breaking microRNA (miRNA) publication. Here, we make the case that the miRNA field is mature, utilising bibliometrics. Methods. Utilising the Web of Science™ (WoS) database publication and citation information, we charted the history of miRNA-related publications, describing and dissecting contributions by publication type (plus category, pay-per-view or open access), journal (highlighting dominant journals), by country, citations and languages. Results. We found that the United States of America (USA) publishes the most miRNA papers, followed by China and Germany. Significantly, publications attributed to the USA also receive the most citations per publication, followed by a close grouping of England, Germany and France. We also describe the relevance and acceptance of the miRNA field to different research areas, through its uptake in areas from oncology to plant sciences. Exploring the recent momentous change in publishing, we find that although pay-per view articles vastly out-number open-access articles, the citation rate of pay-per-view articles is currently less than double that of open-access. Conclusions. We believe the trends described here represent the typical evolution of a research field. By analysing publications, citations and distribution patterns, key moments in the evolution of this research area are recognised, indicating the maturation of the miRNA field and providing guidance for future research endeavours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.