Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25802736›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2015

Heterogeneous responses and cross reactivity between the major peanut allergens Ara h 1, 2,3 and 6 in a mouse model for peanut allergy.

Joost J Smit, Maarten T Pennings, Karina Willemsen, Manon van Roest, Els van Hoffen, Raymond H Pieters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Effector Function of Allergens.Frontiers in allergy · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joost J SmitImmunotoxicology group, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands ; Utrecht Centre for Food Allergy, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maarten T PenningsUtrecht Centre for Food Allergy, Utrecht, The Netherlands ; Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands ; Current affiliation: HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karina WillemsenImmunotoxicology group, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Manon van RoestImmunotoxicology group, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Els van HoffenUtrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands ; Current affiliation: NIZO food research BV, Ede, The Netherlands.
Raymond H PietersImmunotoxicology group, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relative contribution and the relation between individual peanut allergens in peanut allergic responses is still matter of debate. We determined the individual contribution of peanut proteins to B, T cell and allergic effector responses in a mouse model for peanut allergy.

methodsMice were immunized and challenged by oral gavage with peanut protein extract or isolated allergens Ara h 1, 2, 3 and 6 followed by assessment of food allergic manifestations. In addition, T cell responses to the individual proteins were measured by an in vitro dendritic cell-T cell assay.

resultsSensitization with the individual peanut proteins elicited IgE responses with specificity to the allergen used as expected. However, cross reactivity among Ara h 1, 2, 3 and 6 was observed. T cell re-stimulations with peanut extract and individual peanut proteins also showed cross reactivity between Ara h 1, 2, 3 and 6. Despite the cross reactivity at the IgE level, only Ara h 2 and 6 were able to elicit mast cell degranulation after an oral challenge. However, after systemic challenge, Ara h 1, 2 and 6 and to lesser extent Ara h 3 were able to elicit anaphylactic responses.

conclusionsAra h 1, 2, 3 and 6 sensitize via the intra-gastric route, but differ in their capacity to cause allergic effector responses. Interestingly, extensive cross reactivity at T cell and antibody level is observed among Ara h 1, 2, 3 and 6, which may have important implications for the diagnosis and therapy of peanut allergy. Awareness about the relative contribution of individual peanut allergens and cross reactivity between these allergens is of importance for current research in diagnostics and therapeutics for and the mechanism of peanut allergy.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisCross-reactivityIgEMouse modelPeanut allergyPeanut proteinsSensitizationT cell

Identifiers

PMID25802736
PMCPMC4369825
OpenAlexW2098687882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.