Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25802490›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2015

Any Way You Slice It-A Comparison of Confocal Microscopy Techniques.

James Jonkman, Claire M Brown

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tetrahedral serial multiview microscopy and image fusion for improved resolution and extent in stained zebrafish embryos.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Single-shot time-folded fluorescence lifetime imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James Jonkman1 Advanced Optical Microscopy Facility (AOMF), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and 2 Life Sciences Complex Advanced BioImaging Facility (ABIF), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Claire M Brown1 Advanced Optical Microscopy Facility (AOMF), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and 2 Life Sciences Complex Advanced BioImaging Facility (ABIF), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The confocal fluorescence microscope has become a popular tool for life sciences researchers, primarily because of its ability to remove blur from outside of the focal plane of the image. Several different kinds of confocal microscopes have been developed, each with advantages and disadvantages. This article will cover the grid confocal, classic confocal laser-scanning microscope (CLSM), the resonant scanning-CLSM, and the spinning-disk confocal microscope. The way each microscope technique works, the best applications the technique is suited for, the limitations of the technique, and new developments for each technology will be presented. Researchers who have access to a range of different confocal microscopes (e.g., through a local core facility) should find this paper helpful for choosing the best confocal technology for specific imaging applications. Others with funding to purchase an instrument should find the article helpful in deciding which technology is ideal for their area of research.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLightingMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Fluorescence3D imaginggrid confocallaser scanningresonant scanningspinning disk

Identifiers

PMID25802490
PMCPMC4365987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.