Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25802478›Full record

SynthesisDisease markers2015

MTHFR C677T gene polymorphism and head and neck cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 23 publications.

Yu-Ming Niu, Mo-Hong Deng, Wen Chen, Xian-Tao Zeng, Jie Luo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Disease markers, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and risk of cancer: evidence from 446 case-control studies.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Modulators of Redox Metabolism in Head and Neck Cancer.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu-Ming NiuDepartment of Stomatology and Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, China.
Mo-Hong DengThe State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine, Ministry of Education, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Wen ChenDepartment of Radiology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, 32 South Renmin Road, Shiyan 442000, China.
Xian-Tao ZengCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China.
Jie LuoDepartment of Neurosurgery and Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveConflicting results on the association between MTHFR polymorphism and head and neck cancer (HNC) risk were reported. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to derive a more precise relationship between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and HNC risk.

methodsThree online databases of PubMed, Embase, and CNKI were researched on the associations between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and HNC risk. Twenty-three published case-control studies involving 4,955 cases and 8,805 controls were collected. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the relationship between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and HNC risk. Sensitivity analysis, cumulative analyses, and publication bias were conducted to validate the strength of the results.

resultsOverall, no significant association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and HNC risk was found in this meta-analysis (T versus C: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.92-1.18; TT versus CC: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.90-1.46; CT versus CC: OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.85-1.17; CT + TT versus CC: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87-1.18; TT versus CC + CT: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.98-1.26). In the subgroup analysis by HWE, ethnicity, study design, cancer location, and negative significant associations were detected in almost all genetic models, except for few significant risks that were found in thyroid cancer.

conclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrates that MTHFR C677T polymorphism may not be a risk factor for the developing of HNC.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissensePolymorphism, Single NucleotideCase-Control StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)MTHFR protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25802478
PMCPMC4329770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.