Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25802430›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2015

Dot-ELISA Rapid Test Using Recombinant 56-kDa Protein Antigens for Serodiagnosis of Scrub Typhus.

Wuttikon Rodkvamtook, Zhiwen Zhang, Chien-Chung Chao, Erin Huber, Dharadhida Bodhidatta, Jariyanart Gaywee, John Grieco, Narongrid Sirisopana, Manerat Kityapan, Michael Lewis and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Urine Metabolite of Mice with Orientia tsutsugamushi Infection.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
  4. A Use of 56-kDa Recombinant Protein ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Scrub typhus: risks, diagnostic issues, and management challenges.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2017
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Genome-WideFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wuttikon RodkvamtookArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Zhiwen ZhangArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Chien-Chung ChaoArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Erin HuberArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Dharadhida BodhidattaArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Jariyanart GayweeArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland.
John GriecoArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Narongrid SirisopanaArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Manerat KityapanArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Michael LewisArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Wei-Mei ChingArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (AFRIMS), Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand; Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), Silver Spring, Maryland; Preventive Medicine and Biometrics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland wei.ching@med.navy.mil.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a rapid dot-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (dot-ELISA) using the combination of recombinant 56-kDa protein antigens that exhibited broad reactivity with serum antibodies against the four most prevalent strains (Karp, Kato, Gilliam, and TA763) of Orientia tsutsugamushi. The assay is rapid (30 minutes), and can be done at room temperature, and results can be read by the naked eye. Only a simple shaker is required to wash the membrane. Sera from 338 patients suspected of being ill with scrub typhus from rural hospitals around Thailand were tested using this dot-ELISA. Seventy-five (22.2%) patients were found to be positive. The sensitivity and specificity of dot-ELISA were determined using the indirect immunofluorescent assay (IFA) test as the gold standard, with the cutoff titer of immunoglobulin peroxidase conjugate M (IgM)/G (IgG) greater than 1:400/1:400. The dot-ELISA had a sensitivity of 98.5%, a specificity of 96.3%, a positive predictive value of 86.7%, and a negative predictive value of 99.6% for the acute-phase specimens. The results indicate that dot-ELISA rapid test using recombinant 56-kDa protein antigen was comparable with the IFA test and may be very useful for the diagnosis of scrub typhus in rural hospitals, where IFA is not available.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MOrientia tsutsugamushiRecombinant ProteinsScrub TyphusSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25802430
PMCPMC4426586
OpenAlexW2020950583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.