Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25802384›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Structural and kinetic analysis of protein-aggregate strains in vivo using binary epitope mapping.

Johan Bergh, Per Zetterström, Peter M Andersen, Thomas Brännström, Karin S Graffmo, P Andreas Jonsson, Lisa Lang, Jens Danielsson, Mikael Oliveberg, Stefan L Marklund

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johan BerghDepartments of Medical Biosciences and.
Per ZetterströmDepartments of Medical Biosciences and.
Peter M AndersenPharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, SE-90186 Umeå, Sweden; and.
Thomas BrännströmDepartments of Medical Biosciences and.
Karin S GraffmoDepartments of Medical Biosciences and.
P Andreas JonssonDepartments of Medical Biosciences and.
Lisa LangDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Arrhenius Laboratory for Natural Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Jens DanielssonDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Arrhenius Laboratory for Natural Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Mikael OlivebergDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Arrhenius Laboratory for Natural Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan L MarklundDepartments of Medical Biosciences and stefan.marklund@medbio.umu.se.
Stockholm University · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite considerable progress in uncovering the molecular details of protein aggregation in vitro, the cause and mechanism of protein-aggregation disease remain poorly understood. One reason is that the amount of pathological aggregates in neural tissue is exceedingly low, precluding examination by conventional approaches. We present here a method for determination of the structure and quantity of aggregates in small tissue samples, circumventing the above problem. The method is based on binary epitope mapping using anti-peptide antibodies. We assessed the usefulness and versatility of the method in mice modeling the neurodegenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, which accumulate intracellular aggregates of superoxide dismutase-1. Two strains of aggregates were identified with different structural architectures, molecular properties, and growth kinetics. Both were different from superoxide dismutase-1 aggregates generated in vitro under a variety of conditions. The strains, which seem kinetically under fragmentation control, are associated with different disease progressions, complying with and adding detail to the growing evidence that seeding, infectivity, and strain dependence are unifying principles of neurodegenerative disease.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAnimalsBrainEpitope MappingEpitopesHumansMiceMice, TransgenicMolecular Sequence DataNeurodegenerative DiseasesProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProtein MultimerizationProteinsSpinal CordEpitopesProteinsSOD1 protein, humanSod1 protein, mouseSuperoxide DismutaseSuperoxide Dismutase-1amyotrophic lateral sclerosisneurodegenerationprotein aggregationstraintransgenic mice

Identifiers

PMID25802384
PMCPMC4394267
OpenAlexW1972463563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.