Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25802148›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2015

Dopamine modulates egalitarian behavior in humans.

Ignacio Sáez, Lusha Zhu, Eric Set, Andrew Kayser, Ming Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Dopamine Boosts Motivation for Prosocial Effort in Parkinson's Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Substantial Heritability Underlies Fairness Norm Adaptation Capability and its Neural Basis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ignacio SáezHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 175 Li Ka Shing Center, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, 2220 Piedmont Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Lusha ZhuVirginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA.
Eric SetHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 175 Li Ka Shing Center, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, 2220 Piedmont Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Andrew KayserHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 175 Li Ka Shing Center, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; Department of Neurology, VA Northern California Health Care System, 150 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553, USA. Electronic address: andrew.kayser@ucsf.edu.
Ming HsuHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 175 Li Ka Shing Center, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, 2220 Piedmont Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Electronic address: mhsu@haas.berkeley.edu.

Funding

Program Development (Pilot)P30AG012839 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI William H Dow · 1999 to 2026
$18.6M
Neurobiological Substrates of Social Behavior: A Neuroeconomic FrameworkR01MH098023 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HSU, MING · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012839NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Egalitarian motives form a powerful force in promoting prosocial behavior and enabling large-scale cooperation in the human species [1]. At the neural level, there is substantial, albeit correlational, evidence suggesting a link between dopamine and such behavior [2, 3]. However, important questions remain about the specific role of dopamine in setting or modulating behavioral sensitivity to prosocial concerns. Here, using a combination of pharmacological tools and economic games, we provide critical evidence for a causal involvement of dopamine in human egalitarian tendencies. Specifically, using the brain penetrant catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitor tolcapone [4, 5], we investigated the causal relationship between dopaminergic mechanisms and two prosocial concerns at the core of a number of widely used economic games: (1) the extent to which individuals directly value the material payoffs of others, i.e., generosity, and (2) the extent to which they are averse to differences between their own payoffs and those of others, i.e., inequity. We found that dopaminergic augmentation via COMT inhibition increased egalitarian tendencies in participants who played an extended version of the dictator game [6]. Strikingly, computational modeling of choice behavior [7] revealed that tolcapone exerted selective effects on inequity aversion, and not on other computational components such as the extent to which individuals directly value the material payoffs of others. Together, these data shed light on the causal relationship between neurochemical systems and human prosocial behavior and have potential implications for our understanding of the complex array of social impairments accompanying neuropsychiatric disorders involving dopaminergic dysregulation.

Indexed as

AltruismGame TheorySocial BehaviorAdultBenzophenonesCatechol O-Methyltransferase InhibitorsChoice BehaviorDopamineFemaleHumansMaleMotivationNitrophenolsTolcaponeBenzophenonesCatechol O-Methyltransferase InhibitorsDopamineNitrophenolsTolcapone

Identifiers

PMID25802148
PMCPMC4627633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.