ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2015
Early and mid-term outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation and future prospects.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of a centrifugal blood pump designed using an industrial method through experimental and numerical study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2021Article
- Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Outcomes of Asian-Americans Implanted With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: An Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) Analysis.Heart, lung & circulation · 2020Article
- Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome Associated with Cardiovascular Diseases.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2019Review
- Impact of mitral valve intervention with left ventricular assist device implantation on postoperative outcomes and morphologic change.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2018Article
- Article
- Readmissions after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2017Article
- Towards destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices in Japan.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAlthough implantable left ventricular assist device use as a bridge to heart transplantation is increasing, its permanent use as destination therapy is not permitted in Japan. This retrospective review assessed early and mid-term outcomes of implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device compared with extracorporeal pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. Issues regarding left ventricular assist device as destination therapy are discussed.
methodsFrom January 2009 to September 2013, 72 patients underwent left ventricular assist device implantation at our institute. Forty patients were supported by extracorporeal pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices (ex-VAD group) and 32 patients with implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (im-VAD group).
resultsThe median duration of ventricular assist device support was 563 days. The actuarial survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 92.3 and 79.2 % in the ex-VAD group and 96.4 and 72.3 % in the im-VAD group, respectively. Approximately 50 % of patients in both groups developed cerebrovascular complications within 1 year postoperatively. Six months post-implantation, almost 90 % of the ex-VAD group patients suffered exit-site infection compared with about 50 % in the im-VAD group. Readmission rate was 1.74 per patient-year; major causes were driveline exit-site infection (52 %) and cerebrovascular complication (14 %).
conclusionsEarly and mid-term outcomes were satisfactory after both extracorporeal pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device and implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation, although a considerable level of postoperative complications was observed. More data after left ventricular assist device surgery are needed to enable its consideration as a destination therapy option in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.