ArticleClinical and translational science2015
Evolution of Multidisciplinary Translational Teams (MTTs): Insights for Accelerating Translational Innovations.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subtyping Social Determinants of Health in the "All of Us" Program: Network Analysis and Visualization Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Building boundary-crossers in clinical-translational research: An exploratory study of a novel communication intervention.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Beyond deadlines and deliverables: Identifying barriers and facilitators to enhance the PROMICE of translational teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Network Analysis for Formative Evaluation of Collaborative, Team Science Research Partnerships.Evaluation & the health professions · 2023Article
- Subtyping Social Determinants of Health inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- A leadership model supporting maturation of high-performance translational teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Exploring team dynamics during the development of a multi-institutional cross-disciplinary translational team: Implications for potential best practices.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Temporal development of high-performance translational teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Competencies supporting high-performance translational teams: A review of the SciTS evidence base.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- A Framework for Modeling and Interpreting Patient Subgroups Applied to Hospital Readmission: Visual Analytical Approach.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Standards for practical intravenous rapid drug desensitization & delabeling: A WAO committee statement.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022Review
- Interdisciplinary Collaborations in Digital Health Research: Mixed Methods Case Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Novel approach for tracking interdisciplinary research productivity using institutional databases.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Implementing an evidence-based competency model for science team training and evaluation: TeamMAPPS.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Developing and evaluating a team development intervention to support interdisciplinary teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Individual and team competencies in translational teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- IDeA States Pediatric Clinical Trials Network for Underserved and Rural Communities.Pediatrics · 2020Article
- Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Enhancing reproducibility using interprofessional team best practices.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Approaches to Measuring Trends in Interdisciplinary Research Publications at One Academic Medical Center.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is growing consensus about the factors critical for development and productivity of multidisciplinary teams, but few studies have evaluated their longitudinal changes. We present a longitudinal study of 10 multidisciplinary translational teams (MTTs), based on team process and outcome measures, evaluated before and after 3 years of CTSA collaboration. Using a mixed methods approach, an expert panel of five judges (familiar with the progress of the teams) independently rated team performance based on four process and four outcome measures, and achieved a rating consensus. Although all teams made progress in translational domains, other process and outcome measures were highly variable. The trajectory profiles identified four categories of team performance. Objective bibliometric analysis of CTSA-supported MTTs with positive growth in process scores showed that these teams tended to have enhanced scientific outcomes and published in new scientific domains, indicating the conduct of innovative science. Case exemplars revealed that MTTs that experienced growth in both process and outcome evaluative criteria also experienced greater innovation, defined as publications in different areas of science. Of the eight evaluative criteria, leadership-related behaviors were the most resistant to the interventions introduced. Well-managed MTTs demonstrate objective productivity and facilitate innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.