Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25801324›Full record

ReviewPublic health nursing (Boston, Mass.)

A Conceptual Model to Promote the Retention of Women with Physical Disabilities in Research.

Laura Mood, Dena Hassouneh, Elizabeth McNeff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura MoodOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Dena HassounehOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Elizabeth McNeffRegional Research Institute, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Women Physical Disability and Depression: Communities Responding Now!R01MH079818 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HASSOUNEH, DENA MOHAMMAD · 2008 to 2010
$760k
NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD001270NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inadequate participant recruitment and retention practices can affect sample representativeness and thus the generalizability of research findings. Retention of research participants has been examined within the literature to some extent; however, there is no consensus on best practice in achieving acceptable results. Furthermore, there is a gap in understanding how to engage and retain women with physical disabilities (WPDs) in research. To address these oversights, we review (1) the significance of retention as a methodological concern, (2) factors that influence the involvement and retention of participants in research, including individual, population, and health-illness considerations, and (3) particular circumstances impacting the inclusion and retention of WPDs in research. On the basis of a review of the literature and our experience with the Healing Pathways randomized controlled trial (RCT), we present a conceptual model to guide culturally sensitive health research implementation with WPDs, and promote the engagement and retention of this group in RCTs and other forms of interventional health research.

Indexed as

Women's HealthAdultFemaleHealth PromotionHumansModels, OrganizationalPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient DropoutsPersons with Disabilitiesdisabilitypartnershipsprogram planningprospective studies

Identifiers

PMID25801324
PMCPMC4512922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.