Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25801110›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2016

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in humans: feasibility and safety of transgastric closure using the OTSC system.

Richard Magdeburg, Georg Kaehler

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Validation of NOViSE.Surgical innovation · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard MagdeburgDepartment of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. richard.magdeburg@umm.de.
Georg KaehlerDepartment of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Heidelberg University · USUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNOTES is a technique in which an operation is performed within the body without a skin incision by using a natural body orifice to provide access. The principal challenge of transgastric NOTES procedures is still the feasibility and safety of access closure. Currently, there are very limited data regarding the closure of transgastric NOTES in humans, and the standard method and device for closure has not been defined. Herein, we evaluate the feasibility and safety of gastric closure after NOTES procedures in humans with the over-the-scope clip (OTSC).

methodsReview of collected data of patients underwent transgastric NOTES in prospective clinical studies between April 2010 and March 2014 focused on the gastric closure with the OTSC.

resultsA total of 43 patients underwent transgastric NOTES: 36 patients with an acute appendicitis, six patients with a prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and one patient with uterus myomatosus. In all 43 cases, the incision of the gastric wall and the endoscopic access to the abdominal cavity succeeded without any difficulty. After performing transgastric procedures, it was possible to close the access by OTSC in all cases. There were all in all three adverse events: one major (Clavien-Dindo Grade III) and two minor (Clavien-Dindo Grades I and II).

conclusionEven if we could show for the first time in more than 40 consecutive patients that there is a safe approach for closing the transgastric access, it is absolutely necessary that further investigation in clinical settings has to be done to establish clear indications and guidelines for the use of transgastric NOTES.

Indexed as

AdultAppendectomyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansHysterectomyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryOutcome Assessment, Health CareOvariectomyProspective StudiesSalpingectomyStomachClosureNOTESOTSCTransgastric

Identifiers

PMID25801110
OpenAlexW1991535351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.