Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25801031›Full record

ArticleCell reports2015

Origins and impacts of new mammalian exons.

Jason J Merkin, Ping Chen, Maria S Alexis, Sampsa K Hautaniemi, Christopher B Burge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Is there any intron sliding in mammals?BMC evolutionary biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Human exonization through differential nucleosome occupancy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jason J MerkinDepartments of Biology and Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Ping ChenResearch Programs Unit, Genome-Scale Biology and Institute of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Maria S AlexisDepartments of Biology and Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Program in Computational and Systems Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Sampsa K HautaniemiResearch Programs Unit, Genome-Scale Biology and Institute of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Christopher B BurgeDepartments of Biology and Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Program in Computational and Systems Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA. Electronic address: cburge@mit.edu.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Regulation and Function of Alternative mRNA Isoform Expression in MammalsR01HG002439 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BURGE, CHRISTOPHER B · 2002 to 2024
$9.7M
Graduate Training in Computational and Systems BiologyT32GM087237 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BURGE, CHRISTOPHER B · 2009 to 2023
$4.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS 5-R01-HG002439NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002439NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM087237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian genes are composed of exons, but the evolutionary origins and functions of new internal exons are poorly understood. Here, we analyzed patterns of exon gain using deep cDNA sequencing data from five mammals and one bird, identifying thousands of species- and lineage-specific exons. Most new exons derived from unique rather than repetitive intronic sequence. Unlike exons conserved across mammals, species-specific internal exons were mostly located in 5' UTRs and alternatively spliced. They were associated with upstream intronic deletions, increased nucleosome occupancy, and RNA polymerase II pausing. Genes containing new internal exons had increased gene expression, but only in tissues in which the exon was included. Increased expression correlated with the level of exon inclusion, promoter proximity, and signatures of cotranscriptional splicing. Altogether, these findings suggest that increased splicing at the 5' ends of genes enhances expression and that changes in 5' end splicing alter gene expression between tissues and between species.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAlternative SplicingAnimalsBase SequenceBirdsExonsIntronsMicePromoter Regions, GeneticRNA SplicingSequence Deletion

Identifiers

PMID25801031
PMCPMC4715653
OpenAlexW2079921406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.