ArticleFamilial cancer2015
Validation of an online questionnaire for identifying people at risk of familial and hereditary colorectal cancer.
Article in Familial cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk of cancer in individuals with Lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Family history tools for primary care: A systematic review.The European journal of general practice · 2022Pooled it
- Leveraging Health Information Technology to Collect Family Cancer History: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluation of an online family history tool for identifying hereditary and familial colorectal cancer.Familial cancer · 2018Trial
- Online validation of DC/TMD Axis II questionnaires for assessing temporomandibular disorders.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- Feasibility of an electronic patient-facing cancer family history tool in medically underserved populations.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Screening and Management of Lynch Syndrome: The Chinese Experience.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023Review
- Identification of individuals at high-risk for pancreatic cancer using a digital patient-input tool combining family cancer history screening and new-onset diabetes.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Evaluating the effects of a risk-adapted screening program for familial colorectal cancer in individuals between 25 and 50 years of age: study protocol for the prospective population-based intervention study FARKOR.BMC gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Validation of a digital identification tool for individuals at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2019Article
- What characterizes cancer family history collection tools? A critical literature review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2018Review
- Difference between tablet methods and paper questionnaire methods of conducting a survey with community-dwelling elderly.Journal of physical therapy science · 2017Article
- Identification of hereditary cancer in the general population: development and validation of a screening questionnaire for obtaining the family history of cancer.Cancer medicine · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed and validated an online questionnaire to document familial cancer history, in order to facilitate the detection of persons with a familial or hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The development of the self-administered online questionnaire for the assessment of familial and hereditary CRC risk was based on nationwide criteria for referral to genetic specialists due to a Lynch syndrome suspicion, as well as existing criteria for surveillance colonoscopies because of an increased risk of familial CRC. The questionnaire was validated at a private colonoscopy center. Patients scheduled for colonoscopy were enrolled (n = 150). Performance of the questionnaire was assessed by comparing referrals based on questionnaire data against referral decisions based on full pedigree data. In a second validation phase, referrals based on questionnaire data were compared with referrals based on data collected in a telephone interview. We also calculated inter-observer agreement in referral decisions. In the first validation phase, the questionnaire had a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 55-98%) at a specificity of 98% (95% CI 87-100%) in identifying persons qualifying for referral. In the second validation phase, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 63-100) at a specificity of 97% (95% CI 91-99%). In both validation phases an inter-observer agreement of 100% in referral decisions was achieved. The online questionnaire has a high sensitivity and specificity in identifying persons qualifying for referral because of suspected Lynch syndrome or familial CRC. Implementation of this tool in colonoscopy clinics can facilitate the detection of patients with hereditary or familial CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.