Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25800395›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2015

Synergistic action of image-guided radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy.

Jennifer A Locke, Alan Dal Pra, Stéphane Supiot, Padraig Warde, Robert G Bristow

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Sequencing of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy With External-Beam Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. PEGylated reduced-graphene oxide hybridized with FeJournal of materials chemistry. B · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer A LockeDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Gordon &Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Level 6, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Alan Dal PraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 4, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Stéphane SupiotDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-St-Herblain, 8 quai Moncousu, BP 70721, 44000 Nantes, France.
Padraig WardeRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Robert G BristowRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combined use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) can improve overall survival in aggressive, localized prostate cancer. However, owing to the adverse effects of prolonged ADT, it is imperative to identify the patients who would benefit from this combined-modality therapy relative to the use of IGRT alone. Opportunities exist for more personalized approaches in treating aggressive, locally advanced prostate cancer. Biomarkers--such as disseminated tumour cells, circulating tumour cells, genomic signatures and molecular imaging techniques--could identify the patients who are at greatest risk for systemic metastases and who would benefit from the addition of systemic ADT. By contrast, when biomarkers of systemic disease are not present, treatment could proceed using local IGRT alone. The choice of drug, treatment duration and timing of ADT relative to IGRT could be predicated on these personalized approaches to prostate cancer medicine. These novel treatment intensification and reduction strategies could result in improved prostate-cancer-specific survival and overall survival, without incurring the added expense of metabolic syndrome and other adverse effects of ADT in all patients.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Image-GuidedAndrogen AntagonistsAndrostenesBenzamidesBiomarkersCombined Modality TherapyDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFlutamideGoserelinHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentabirateroneAndrogen AntagonistsAndrostenesBenzamidesBiomarkersenzalutamideFlutamideGoserelinNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoin

Identifiers

PMID25800395
OpenAlexW1977885866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.