Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25800324›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2015

Emerging from the bottleneck: benefits of the comparative approach to modern neuroscience.

Eliot A Brenowitz, Harold H Zakon

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. eLemur: A cellular-resolution 3D atlas of the mouse lemur brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Evolution of prefrontal cortex.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eliot A BrenowitzDepartments of Psychology and Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: eliotb@uw.edu.
Harold H ZakonDepartments of Neuroscience and Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

Funding

Vector and Transgenic Mouse CoreP30DK017047 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sakeneh Zraika · 1986 to 2026
$41.4M
COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF VOCAL CONTROLR01MH053032 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRENOWITZ, ELIOT A · 1995 to 2015
$5.3M
Hormones and Brain ProtectionR01NS075331 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRENOWITZ, ELIOT A · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK017047NIMH NIH HHS MH53032NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH053032NINDS NIH HHS NS075331NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscience has historically exploited a wide diversity of animal taxa. Recently, however, research has focused increasingly on a few model species. This trend has accelerated with the genetic revolution, as genomic sequences and genetic tools became available for a few species, which formed a bottleneck. This coalescence on a small set of model species comes with several costs that are often not considered, especially in the current drive to use mice explicitly as models for human diseases. Comparative studies of strategically chosen non-model species can complement model species research and yield more rigorous studies. As genetic sequences and tools become available for many more species, we are poised to emerge from the bottleneck and once again exploit the rich biological diversity offered by comparative studies.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsEvolution, MolecularHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansNeurosciencescomparativemodelmousetranslational

Identifiers

PMID25800324
PMCPMC4417368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.