Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25800274›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2015

CD8+ T cells in cutaneous leishmaniasis: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Fernanda O Novais, Phillip Scott

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Oxygen and immunity toInfection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. ThePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. The Role of Senescent CD8Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernanda O NovaisDepartment of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Room 346 Hill Pavilion, 380 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-4539, USA, novais@vet.upenn.edu.
Phillip Scott
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

The Role of Innate Cells in the Pathogenesis of Leishmania Braziliensis InfectionU01AI088650 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCOTT, PHILLIP · 2011 to 2019
$4.3M
Protective and Pathologic Roles for CD8+ T cells in LeishmaniasisR01AI106842 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCOTT, PHILLIP · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS AI088650NIAID NIH HHS AI106842NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI106842NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI088650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD8(+) T lymphocytes are components of the adaptive immune response and play an important role in protection against many viral and bacterial infections. However, their role in parasitic infections is less well understood. In leishmaniasis, a disease caused by intracellular protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania, CD8(+) T cells have been shown to be protective. However, increasing evidence indicates that CD8(+) T cells may also exacerbate disease. In this review, we will describe the situations where CD8(+) T cells are either good or bad for the outcome of the infection and attempt to reconcile the dual role played by CD8(+) T cells in cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansLeishmaniaLeishmaniasis, CutaneousT-Lymphocyte SubsetsHistocompatibility Antigens Class I

Identifiers

PMID25800274
PMCPMC4439344
OpenAlexW2093535438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.